From: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>
To: Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>
Cc: "Álvaro Fernández Rojas" <noltari@gmail.com>,
"Jonas Gorski" <jogo@openwrt.org>,
"Richard Purdie" <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 (v3)] leds-bcm6328: Reuse bcm6328_led_set() instead of copying its functionality
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:19:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5652E84B.1060804@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5652283D.1050601@simon.arlott.org.uk>
On 11/22/2015 09:40 PM, Simon Arlott wrote:
> When ensuring a consistent initial LED state in bcm6328_led (as they may
> be blinking instead of on/off), the LED register is set using an inverted
> copy of bcm6328_led_set(). To avoid further errors relating to active low
> handling, call this function directly instead.
>
> As bcm6328_led_set() expects to acquire the spinlock, call it after
> unlocking. There is no need to hold the spinlock between reading the
> current value and setting it again because the LED device has not yet
> been registered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>
> ---
> On 17/11/15 08:15, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> On 11/17/2015 09:06 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>> On 11/17/2015 08:42 AM, Simon Arlott wrote:
>>>> On 16/11/15 21:33, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
>>>>> Still wrong, you are setting the led value after unlocking the spinlock.
>>>>
>>>> I have to unlock it because bcm6328_led_set() locks that spinlock.
>>>
>>> Commit message from the first version of the patch justified that
>>> properly. It should be preserved in the final patch:
>>>
>>> As bcm6328_led_set() expects to acquire the spinlock, narrow the locking
>>> to only cover reading of the current state. There is no need to hold the
>>> spinlock between reading the current value and setting it again because
>>> the LED device has not yet been registered.
>>
>> Hmm, if so, then spin_lock in bcm6328_led isn't needed at all, as it
>> is guaranteed that no concurrent process will be executing this
>> function.
>
> No, it's still required because it has to protect the read/modify/write
> for all the other LED devices that use the same register.
Right, other already registered LED class devices can interfere.
> drivers/leds/leds-bcm6328.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-bcm6328.c b/drivers/leds/leds-bcm6328.c
> index c7ea5c6..95d0cf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-bcm6328.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-bcm6328.c
> @@ -314,14 +314,10 @@ static int bcm6328_led(struct device *dev, struct device_node *nc, u32 reg,
> } else {
> led->cdev.brightness = LED_OFF;
> }
> -
> - if ((led->active_low && led->cdev.brightness == LED_FULL) ||
> - (!led->active_low && led->cdev.brightness == LED_OFF))
> - bcm6328_led_mode(led, BCM6328_LED_MODE_ON);
> - else
> - bcm6328_led_mode(led, BCM6328_LED_MODE_OFF);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
>
> + bcm6328_led_set(&led->cdev, led->cdev.brightness);
> +
> led->cdev.brightness_set = bcm6328_led_set;
> led->cdev.blink_set = bcm6328_blink_set;
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-23 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-24 16:53 [PATCH] leds: bcm6328: Handle default-state of LEDs correctly Simon Arlott
2015-10-26 8:45 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2015-10-26 12:36 ` Simon Arlott
2015-10-28 10:56 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2015-10-29 19:48 ` [PATCH] leds-bcm6328: Reuse bcm6328_led_set() instead of copying its functionality Simon Arlott
2015-11-04 15:41 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2015-11-04 15:46 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas
2015-11-05 10:41 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2015-11-15 13:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Simon Arlott
2015-11-15 13:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] leds-bcm6328: Swap LED ON and OFF definitions Simon Arlott
2015-11-23 10:20 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2015-11-16 14:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] leds-bcm6328: Reuse bcm6328_led_set() instead of copying its functionality Jacek Anaszewski
2015-11-16 20:24 ` [PATCH 1/2 (v2)] " Simon Arlott
2015-11-16 21:33 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas
2015-11-17 7:42 ` Simon Arlott
2015-11-17 8:06 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2015-11-17 8:15 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2015-11-22 20:40 ` [PATCH 1/2 (v3)] " Simon Arlott
2015-11-23 10:19 ` Jacek Anaszewski [this message]
2015-11-23 10:20 ` [PATCH 1/2 (v2)] " Jacek Anaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5652E84B.1060804@samsung.com \
--to=j.anaszewski@samsung.com \
--cc=jogo@openwrt.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noltari@gmail.com \
--cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
--cc=simon@fire.lp0.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).