linux-leds.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Milo Kim <milo.kim@ti.com>
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem with resetting LED in led_classdev_unregister in case of USB LED device removal
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 07:46:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <569DDBDE.9070300@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <569D7F31.8060905@ti.com>

Am 19.01.2016 um 01:11 schrieb Milo Kim:
> On 01/19/2016 05:52 AM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Setting such a flag from the driver might cause significant effort in different layers.
>> When we talk about thingm as an example, it uses the hid subsystem with the usbhid low level driver.
>> We would need a callback in the usbhid driver (to be notified when the device is unplugged)
>> and a way to propagate this event to the hid core.
>>
>> Maybe simpler: We could ignore ENODEV errors if a function is called from led_classdev_unregister.
>> This way we wouldn't have to touch drivers. I think of something like this:
> 
> Well, simple solution is good but I'm thinking about more generic handling.
> 
> 
> LED subsystem                HID LED driver
> -------------                --------------
>                     Create a LED device
> 
> Registers an event notifier
> 
>                     Device is unplugged,
>                     notify an event to LED
>                     subsystem
> 
> Notification callback sets
> a flag which means HW is removed
> 
> Set-brightness scheduler work
> function checks this flag and
> ignore the brightness update
> 
Most likely not the LED subsystem but the respective driver would have to register the notifier as only the driver
knows what kind of subsystem (usb, ..) is used.

I agree that this would be somewhat cleaner. However I have my doubts that the relatively small benefit of getting read of one
a little annoying error message justifies the required efforts.
> 
> blocking_notifier_chain_register() and blocking_notifier_call_chain() helpers can be used for this implementation.
> 
> However, I'm not sure how much latency will exist between step 3 (device is unplugged) and step 5 (check the flag and ignore brightness-set).
> 
At a first glance I dont't think this is an issue because the notifier chain is blocking.

> Best regards,
> Milo
> 
Regards, Heiner

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-19  6:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-16 21:34 Problem with resetting LED in led_classdev_unregister in case of USB LED device removal Heiner Kallweit
2016-01-18  0:20 ` Milo Kim
2016-01-18  6:37   ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-01-18  8:46     ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-01-18 20:52       ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-01-19  0:11         ` Milo Kim
2016-01-19  6:46           ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2016-01-19  9:10         ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-01-19 20:23           ` Heiner Kallweit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=569DDBDE.9070300@gmail.com \
    --to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=j.anaszewski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=milo.kim@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).