linux-leds.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Craig McQueen <craig.mcqueen@innerrange.com.au>
To: "linux-leds@vger.kernel.org" <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Bug when using both "set" and "blink" functions
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:55:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c59633100dd45e2b28e46d78cbf930c@innerrange.com.au> (raw)

I'd like to control a LED to possibly be any of:

* Off
* On
* Blinking

I've had this working fine in 3.14.x kernel.

But when upgrading to 4.4.x, I found that the transition from "blinking" to "on" didn't work. Namely, if it's blinking and then I call led_set_brightness(led_cdev, LED_FULL), then it wouldn't work (I can't remember if it turned off, or remained blinking; it wasn't on anyway). I worked around it by calling led_set_brightness(led_cdev, LED_OFF) just before led_set_brightness(led_cdev, LED_FULL).

Now I have upgraded to 4.9.x, and found that the transition from "blinking" to "on" again isn't working. The LED ends up being off instead of on.

Examining the code of led_set_brightness():

* Behaviour is different depending on whether the brightness is LED_OFF (it schedules the blink to be turned off "soon") or other (it alters the brightness of subsequent blinks).
* It looks as though there are race conditions in the transition from blinking to steady off -- it schedules the blink to be turned off "soon", so it's difficult to guarantee a reliable transition from blinking to on/off.

The combination of the above two points makes it seem difficult to robustly go from blinking to off/on.

So, my questions are:

* What is the correct way to use the API to reliably control an LED for a combination of off/on/blinking?
* Is my above analysis of the code correct, so that there are indeed race conditions going from blinking to off, leading to undefined behaviour? Can that be fixed?

-- 
Craig McQueen

             reply	other threads:[~2017-11-22  1:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-22  0:55 Craig McQueen [this message]
2017-11-22  3:36 ` Bug when using both "set" and "blink" functions Craig McQueen
2017-11-22 12:36 ` Pavel Machek
2017-11-23  0:14   ` Craig McQueen
2017-11-22 19:53 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-11-23  0:55   ` Craig McQueen
2017-11-23 21:36     ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-11-24  5:23       ` Craig McQueen
2017-11-24 20:13         ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-11-25 21:42 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-11-27  6:51   ` Craig McQueen
2017-11-27 19:26     ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-11-28  4:32       ` Craig McQueen
2017-11-28 21:35         ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-11-28 21:44           ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-11-28 23:40             ` Craig McQueen
2017-11-29 20:45               ` Jacek Anaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5c59633100dd45e2b28e46d78cbf930c@innerrange.com.au \
    --to=craig.mcqueen@innerrange.com.au \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).