From: Craig McQueen <craig.mcqueen@innerrange.com.au>
To: "linux-leds@vger.kernel.org" <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Bug when using both "set" and "blink" functions
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:55:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c59633100dd45e2b28e46d78cbf930c@innerrange.com.au> (raw)
I'd like to control a LED to possibly be any of:
* Off
* On
* Blinking
I've had this working fine in 3.14.x kernel.
But when upgrading to 4.4.x, I found that the transition from "blinking" to "on" didn't work. Namely, if it's blinking and then I call led_set_brightness(led_cdev, LED_FULL), then it wouldn't work (I can't remember if it turned off, or remained blinking; it wasn't on anyway). I worked around it by calling led_set_brightness(led_cdev, LED_OFF) just before led_set_brightness(led_cdev, LED_FULL).
Now I have upgraded to 4.9.x, and found that the transition from "blinking" to "on" again isn't working. The LED ends up being off instead of on.
Examining the code of led_set_brightness():
* Behaviour is different depending on whether the brightness is LED_OFF (it schedules the blink to be turned off "soon") or other (it alters the brightness of subsequent blinks).
* It looks as though there are race conditions in the transition from blinking to steady off -- it schedules the blink to be turned off "soon", so it's difficult to guarantee a reliable transition from blinking to on/off.
The combination of the above two points makes it seem difficult to robustly go from blinking to off/on.
So, my questions are:
* What is the correct way to use the API to reliably control an LED for a combination of off/on/blinking?
* Is my above analysis of the code correct, so that there are indeed race conditions going from blinking to off, leading to undefined behaviour? Can that be fixed?
--
Craig McQueen
next reply other threads:[~2017-11-22 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-22 0:55 Craig McQueen [this message]
2017-11-22 3:36 ` Bug when using both "set" and "blink" functions Craig McQueen
2017-11-22 12:36 ` Pavel Machek
2017-11-23 0:14 ` Craig McQueen
2017-11-22 19:53 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-11-23 0:55 ` Craig McQueen
2017-11-23 21:36 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-11-24 5:23 ` Craig McQueen
2017-11-24 20:13 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-11-25 21:42 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-11-27 6:51 ` Craig McQueen
2017-11-27 19:26 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-11-28 4:32 ` Craig McQueen
2017-11-28 21:35 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-11-28 21:44 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2017-11-28 23:40 ` Craig McQueen
2017-11-29 20:45 ` Jacek Anaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c59633100dd45e2b28e46d78cbf930c@innerrange.com.au \
--to=craig.mcqueen@innerrange.com.au \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).