From: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Pavel Machek" <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Florian Eckert <fe@dev.tdt.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: trigger/tty: Use led_set_brightness_nosleep() to set brightness
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 20:33:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <90efe25c-fea5-cdd0-8bd3-16b9e53e8b56@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230417124403.j64c2lftgyqo2a67@pengutronix.de>
Hi Uwe,
On 4/17/23 14:44, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 02:28:52PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> After commit ba8a86e4dadb ("leds: trigger/tty: Use
>>> led_set_brightness_sync() from workqueue") this is the second try to
>>> pick the right function to set the LED brightness from a trigger.
>>>
>>> led_set_brightness_sync() has the problem that it doesn't work for LEDs
>>> without a .brightness_set_blocking() callback. This is (among others)
>>> the case for LEDs connected to non-sleeping GPIOs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>>
>> I don't think this is right.
>>
>> _nosleep calls _nopm, which assmues it can't sleep, and schedules
>> another workqueue to set the LED.
>
> Then which is the right variant?
> led_set_brightness() and led_set_brightness_nosleep() set via a workqueue
> (which is bad) and led_set_brightness_sync() doesn't work for some LEDs
> (notably LEDs on non-sleeping GPIOs).
Can you remind me the context of this patch, why using workqueue is
bad here?
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-17 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-14 16:48 [PATCH] leds: trigger/tty: Use led_set_brightness_nosleep() to set brightness Uwe Kleine-König
2023-04-16 15:13 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2023-04-17 7:18 ` Florian Eckert
2023-04-17 12:28 ` Pavel Machek
2023-04-17 12:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-04-17 18:33 ` Jacek Anaszewski [this message]
2023-04-17 19:17 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-04-17 19:51 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2023-04-17 22:27 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-04-18 18:02 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2023-04-18 18:04 ` Jacek Anaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=90efe25c-fea5-cdd0-8bd3-16b9e53e8b56@gmail.com \
--to=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
--cc=fe@dev.tdt.de \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).