linux-leds.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Pavel Machek" <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Florian Eckert <fe@dev.tdt.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: trigger/tty: Use led_set_brightness_nosleep() to set brightness
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 20:33:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <90efe25c-fea5-cdd0-8bd3-16b9e53e8b56@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230417124403.j64c2lftgyqo2a67@pengutronix.de>

Hi Uwe,

On 4/17/23 14:44, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 02:28:52PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> After commit ba8a86e4dadb ("leds: trigger/tty: Use
>>> led_set_brightness_sync() from workqueue") this is the second try to
>>> pick the right function to set the LED brightness from a trigger.
>>>
>>> led_set_brightness_sync() has the problem that it doesn't work for LEDs
>>> without a .brightness_set_blocking() callback. This is (among others)
>>> the case for LEDs connected to non-sleeping GPIOs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>>
>> I don't think this is right.
>>
>> _nosleep calls _nopm, which assmues it can't sleep, and schedules
>> another workqueue to set the LED.
> 
> Then which is the right variant?
> led_set_brightness() and led_set_brightness_nosleep() set via a workqueue
> (which is bad) and led_set_brightness_sync() doesn't work for some LEDs
> (notably LEDs on non-sleeping GPIOs).

Can you remind me the context of this patch, why using workqueue is
bad here?

-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-17 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-14 16:48 [PATCH] leds: trigger/tty: Use led_set_brightness_nosleep() to set brightness Uwe Kleine-König
2023-04-16 15:13 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2023-04-17  7:18 ` Florian Eckert
2023-04-17 12:28 ` Pavel Machek
2023-04-17 12:44   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-04-17 18:33     ` Jacek Anaszewski [this message]
2023-04-17 19:17       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-04-17 19:51         ` Jacek Anaszewski
2023-04-17 22:27           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-04-18 18:02             ` Jacek Anaszewski
2023-04-18 18:04               ` Jacek Anaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=90efe25c-fea5-cdd0-8bd3-16b9e53e8b56@gmail.com \
    --to=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
    --cc=fe@dev.tdt.de \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).