* [PATCH] led: core: fix misleading comment after workqueue removal from drivers
@ 2016-01-10 17:16 Heiner Kallweit
2016-01-21 9:03 ` Jacek Anaszewski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2016-01-10 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jacek Anaszewski, linux-leds
Now that workqueues have been removed from individual drivers and
were replaced with a core-internal workqueue we shouldn't
encourage people to add new workqueues to drivers.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/leds.h | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/leds.h b/include/linux/leds.h
index bc1476f..4429887 100644
--- a/include/linux/leds.h
+++ b/include/linux/leds.h
@@ -50,7 +50,10 @@ struct led_classdev {
#define LED_DEV_CAP_FLASH (1 << 23)
/* Set LED brightness level */
- /* Must not sleep, use a workqueue if needed */
+ /* Must not sleep. If no non-blocking version can be provided
+ * set brightness_set_blocking only. The LED core will use an
+ * internal work queue to create a non-blocking version.
+ */
void (*brightness_set)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
enum led_brightness brightness);
/*
--
2.7.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] led: core: fix misleading comment after workqueue removal from drivers
2016-01-10 17:16 [PATCH] led: core: fix misleading comment after workqueue removal from drivers Heiner Kallweit
@ 2016-01-21 9:03 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-01-21 9:50 ` Heiner Kallweit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jacek Anaszewski @ 2016-01-21 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiner Kallweit; +Cc: linux-leds
Hi Heiner,
On 01/10/2016 06:16 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Now that workqueues have been removed from individual drivers and
> were replaced with a core-internal workqueue we shouldn't
> encourage people to add new workqueues to drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/leds.h | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/leds.h b/include/linux/leds.h
> index bc1476f..4429887 100644
> --- a/include/linux/leds.h
> +++ b/include/linux/leds.h
> @@ -50,7 +50,10 @@ struct led_classdev {
> #define LED_DEV_CAP_FLASH (1 << 23)
>
> /* Set LED brightness level */
> - /* Must not sleep, use a workqueue if needed */
> + /* Must not sleep. If no non-blocking version can be provided
> + * set brightness_set_blocking only. The LED core will use an
> + * internal work queue to create a non-blocking version.
> + */
This comment isn't easily comprehensible at first glance.
How about:
"Must not sleep. Use brightness_set_blocking for drivers
that can sleep while setting brightness."
> void (*brightness_set)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
> enum led_brightness brightness);
> /*
>
--
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] led: core: fix misleading comment after workqueue removal from drivers
2016-01-21 9:03 ` Jacek Anaszewski
@ 2016-01-21 9:50 ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-01-21 11:05 ` Jacek Anaszewski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2016-01-21 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jacek Anaszewski; +Cc: linux-leds
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Jacek Anaszewski
<j.anaszewski@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi Heiner,
>
> On 01/10/2016 06:16 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>
>> Now that workqueues have been removed from individual drivers and
>> were replaced with a core-internal workqueue we shouldn't
>> encourage people to add new workqueues to drivers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/leds.h | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/leds.h b/include/linux/leds.h
>> index bc1476f..4429887 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/leds.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/leds.h
>> @@ -50,7 +50,10 @@ struct led_classdev {
>> #define LED_DEV_CAP_FLASH (1 << 23)
>>
>> /* Set LED brightness level */
>> - /* Must not sleep, use a workqueue if needed */
>> + /* Must not sleep. If no non-blocking version can be provided
>> + * set brightness_set_blocking only. The LED core will use an
>> + * internal work queue to create a non-blocking version.
>> + */
>
>
> This comment isn't easily comprehensible at first glance.
>
> How about:
>
> "Must not sleep. Use brightness_set_blocking for drivers
> that can sleep while setting brightness."
>
Yes, this is better. It's simpler and clearer.
Are you going to fix the comment on your own or would you like me
to submit it as a patch?
Regards, Heiner
>> void (*brightness_set)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
>> enum led_brightness brightness);
>> /*
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Jacek Anaszewski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] led: core: fix misleading comment after workqueue removal from drivers
2016-01-21 9:50 ` Heiner Kallweit
@ 2016-01-21 11:05 ` Jacek Anaszewski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jacek Anaszewski @ 2016-01-21 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiner Kallweit; +Cc: linux-leds
On 01/21/2016 10:50 AM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Jacek Anaszewski
> <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> wrote:
>> Hi Heiner,
>>
>> On 01/10/2016 06:16 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>>
>>> Now that workqueues have been removed from individual drivers and
>>> were replaced with a core-internal workqueue we shouldn't
>>> encourage people to add new workqueues to drivers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/leds.h | 5 ++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/leds.h b/include/linux/leds.h
>>> index bc1476f..4429887 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/leds.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/leds.h
>>> @@ -50,7 +50,10 @@ struct led_classdev {
>>> #define LED_DEV_CAP_FLASH (1 << 23)
>>>
>>> /* Set LED brightness level */
>>> - /* Must not sleep, use a workqueue if needed */
>>> + /* Must not sleep. If no non-blocking version can be provided
>>> + * set brightness_set_blocking only. The LED core will use an
>>> + * internal work queue to create a non-blocking version.
>>> + */
>>
>>
>> This comment isn't easily comprehensible at first glance.
>>
>> How about:
>>
>> "Must not sleep. Use brightness_set_blocking for drivers
>> that can sleep while setting brightness."
>>
> Yes, this is better. It's simpler and clearer.
> Are you going to fix the comment on your own or would you like me
> to submit it as a patch?
Since you are the original author of the patch, feel free to submit
the final version with the agreed comment.
>>> void (*brightness_set)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
>>> enum led_brightness brightness);
>>> /*
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Jacek Anaszewski
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-01-21 11:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-01-10 17:16 [PATCH] led: core: fix misleading comment after workqueue removal from drivers Heiner Kallweit
2016-01-21 9:03 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2016-01-21 9:50 ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-01-21 11:05 ` Jacek Anaszewski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).