From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05E1338A9BB; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 14:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768834421; cv=none; b=ggf/F5A6x8sGdUGqsun2y/tMip07XZIEaiB77/qROHV6clJIpoDH5KJAIs2WJ32J1NG4wRE6wtQZMDI6iWcvIqR8rJAxlfIiWcy3qcvRrsS5rIX9U0nW46qXqVODMf6WIIP9gQCzz0dMDuHOC9CLA1FoUDy10rjfMYZ087OtvGQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768834421; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PjW88bpBQA6g4rD0v8HvGLkfvikwUAEsezrluo8/1tg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hXec69QljLR9mmApB9NTJy5UlzrYXvUvpsrhy1u5wiXJnyEM9WiTpecIg/QYiRcP6qtxp7ji63fZpp1MCOQ+0nDA4mwWB4ZQdzQeq69k3wo/5o5KXYLxYXTv1Dlap9SolPRXnAupqOZphlmI0V13O951aKMcJuSWEE7OVTO7GdM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=EpPnoXM3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="EpPnoXM3" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7ACB8C19423; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 14:53:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1768834420; bh=PjW88bpBQA6g4rD0v8HvGLkfvikwUAEsezrluo8/1tg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EpPnoXM3+E5/2yAFQ1+wKxsaHOEk3rliv+M8eFOs+f0/tH8aY9xX3k1VnGdVlIf0j wSgVOg8aZ1s2wTLd1GqOu0q/CaDbTdGQDpQ5VBu7gotmbp1GrbBQJeJfgxYInaTuMy 8JzxAUQR+FBi5XC0ycUR/+zQU1vHBRBOPPvMoL1nGFtDbxCk9/5VOdkPS2e6RcxDaf J+NPEBROOK/li50HJfyOJ8aIzrJNhD6m9eM2jadK8wStMm/TgfqziLbqS4rkQYLUxm /MgY+1fdI+bK6YWAbdwOFYUoKrZe/ebFTogV8C+ibx5/4z6RMwhazE+aoG/CoDYy/e tAYRp7TIqixVw== Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 14:53:33 +0000 From: Daniel Thompson To: =?iso-8859-1?B?QmFybmFi4XMgQ3rpbeFu?= Cc: Lee Jones , Jingoo Han , Pavel Machek , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Bjorn Andersson , Kiran Gunda , Helge Deller , Luca Weiss , Konrad Dybcio , Eugene Lepshy , Gianluca Boiano , Alejandro Tafalla , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Thompson , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Konrad Dybcio Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] backlight: qcom-wled: Change PM8950 WLED configurations Message-ID: References: <20260116-pmi8950-wled-v3-0-e6c93de84079@mainlining.org> <20260116-pmi8950-wled-v3-4-e6c93de84079@mainlining.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20260116-pmi8950-wled-v3-4-e6c93de84079@mainlining.org> On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 08:07:36AM +0100, Barnabás Czémán wrote: > PMI8950 WLED needs same configurations as PMI8994 WLED. > > Fixes: 10258bf4534b ("backlight: qcom-wled: Add PMI8950 compatible") > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio > Signed-off-by: Barnabás Czémán > --- > drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c > index 5decbd39b789..8054e4787725 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c > @@ -1455,7 +1455,8 @@ static int wled_configure(struct wled *wled) > break; > > case 4: > - if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pmi8994-wled")) { > + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pmi8950-wled") || > + of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pmi8994-wled")) { > u32_opts = pmi8994_wled_opts; I still really dislike naming the structures after a single instance of the PMIC when, at inception, that name is known to be wrong. However if the Qualcomm devs are happy with it then I guess I can live with it. Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson (RISCstar) Thanks Daniel.