From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF8CC433FF for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 20:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7E020665 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 20:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="rnR2lQYI" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728419AbfG3UrU (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:47:20 -0400 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]:33236 "EHLO lelv0142.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725913AbfG3UrU (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:47:20 -0400 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x6UKlFCF031501; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:47:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1564519635; bh=W0eIrXgUXVJVC0L41Jr1FWqaVp0jy4+CVqlEc8ChDGM=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=rnR2lQYI9jUo5VbXR8XPmiZpzSiTugTY7sF/4wMOtxsWME2t/WjMjmHxMRNcQNWLs SgQ+U83Gxrgd2J6uu87qZ4pVxi6O6Qm9VJFFwJVAZS99V1iQccYkz9f0+bJycduMK1 uJacT+VKeCgkuUtAfW+8pAzT3xayLg3sc1ulfeQQ= Received: from DFLE100.ent.ti.com (dfle100.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.21]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6UKlFtj067167 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:47:15 -0500 Received: from DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) by DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:47:14 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:47:14 -0500 Received: from [10.250.65.13] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x6UKlEH9097780; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:47:14 -0500 Subject: Re: LEDs next branch To: Jacek Anaszewski , "linux-leds@vger.kernel.org" , Pavel Machek References: <99b075d0-e230-35bc-06c5-712a69fab91d@ti.com> <5be9a3a2-810b-c08a-e631-b7afa005a136@gmail.com> From: Dan Murphy Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:47:15 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5be9a3a2-810b-c08a-e631-b7afa005a136@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Jacek On 7/30/19 3:30 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On 7/30/19 8:40 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: >> Jacek >> >> Did you see/fix this on the led-next branch? >> >> I saw this when booting trying to fix the lm3532 >> >> [    8.651461] led_class: exports duplicate symbol >> devm_led_classdev_register_ext (owned by kernel) >> >> [    8.730063] led_class: exports duplicate symbol >> devm_led_classdev_register_ext (owned by kernel) > I've just tried next-20190730 and haven't noticed anything like that. > I've checked both with driver compiled-in and loaded as a module. > > Tested on qemu versatile board, with tweaked versatile-pb.dts > to include lm3532 DT node. > > There is one issue currently in next but seems to be irrelevant and > can be fixed with [0]. Thanks for checking I will see if I can track it down. Dan > [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/22/720 >