From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2687C76195 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 12:35:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231730AbjCWMfz (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:35:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36214 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231459AbjCWMfy (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:35:54 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x534.google.com (mail-pg1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::534]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D3921EFF6; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 05:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id h31so12430418pgl.6; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 05:35:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1679574949; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sG86IN3Vdawja4OTBqoAaDLMM3BOtyeRil5sAAAYa64=; b=MCd2aKuMluyeMycgMxfOfXwDXdozXv1ihRZOW33fFiVruAoiAWtLyNGnl6cNTBPgXp i/P03egxQrgYgCdLv9Gej5SxaQQycqd8PvT0CJa7wc5TYm1qoQpwrbd/SDNK4Xnghi7v jEnCXO2veOSvRIuvRtE7hwuHw3mGKTnhZ++jMb9pmGpI8+m/T+qIztVMyOSYy9w69Xc3 G95Haw4pQeXYCcuq6AG7yQmaVJ/dWmxeR2xcswmu4lQpp3RbUy96zmdHu4zXSI43t4JJ 0/bGfxZYvQusQPql062GdE+wTJ4oYryyeTiDWIf1DxM45fdd5p2OuMrxplV+V2KSKk6H V0cw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679574949; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sG86IN3Vdawja4OTBqoAaDLMM3BOtyeRil5sAAAYa64=; b=6N2wls2uNS/1r90brd8qaG2PpIgF39nISuvLfAmBCu99k7hl3Zq01WG5iPZCJ3IkE4 YmIqXTRyspHgW6mrUQdtEsHx+DBapPskxkMmrhjQ0zhtUMhD9y1PgkrPI4p3LjkRzpB7 1LXfbibxJPsjsdGHXKav7Dy+wDuhVowst83x1TBfIQ2eZyWar34bb/VxIJFKYo36eUOW BR2y3fdJGpl3uSHxyP413DHXwH9ywvnV8UsyyQsRCqAXMEjFCRD+J00hC+0J11E/B+XV zIPPYRMiuWxdKKS/ahAewKcHnG/QjuyOoolqgtNxBbTRrP5r9bBcV8HuUQ9FG0fcpW/H u/5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXYd2V8d2y73wo9VTNC287jlmHvpqouwAhwL82D53ciZG0WPCnV nT62LWryyB7rzO0PUbRypJU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9BVqV8PjBMAXZJ191R5TCitQaa6ikl1gIzN0x3OiW36GBmgTQUJOqoJoSAPKIdMPo+We9ROA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:954a:0:b0:628:642:c533 with SMTP id w10-20020aa7954a000000b006280642c533mr7091222pfq.31.1679574949055; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 05:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.80] (subs28-116-206-12-43.three.co.id. [116.206.12.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w4-20020a654104000000b0049f5da82b12sm11359254pgp.93.2023.03.23.05.35.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 05:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 19:35:42 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Documentation fixes for MT6370 RGB Content-Language: en-US To: Lee Jones Cc: Linux Documentation , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ARM , Linux MediaTek , Linux LEDs , Jonathan Corbet , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Shuah Khan , ChiaEn Wu , ChiYuan Huang References: <20230319074903.13075-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com> <2b8667b5-ea54-2ef4-f069-a86acd28ecea@gmail.com> <20230323123156.GL2673958@google.com> From: Bagas Sanjaya In-Reply-To: <20230323123156.GL2673958@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org On 3/23/23 19:31, Lee Jones wrote: >> ping > > a) Don't do that! > > b) Especually don't do that 4 days after submission! > > The usual expectation is 2 full weeks before submitting a [RESEND]. > > Mark Brown says it best: > > " > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time > for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so > on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) > please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been > review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. > > Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at > all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed > directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches > anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are > some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches > for the subsystem are normally handled. > " > Ah! I triggered the wrong message at the wrong time. Thanks anyway! -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara