From: "Ron Watkins" <linux-lvm@malor.com>
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] Having duplicate PV problems, think there's a bug in LVM2 md component detection
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:30:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002101c51c41$f6bcfdc0$32dcdc0a@vanish> (raw)
I'm sorry if this is a FAQ or if I'm being stupid. I saw some mentions to
this problem on the old mailing list, but it didn't seem to quite cover what
I'm seeing, and I don't see an archive for this list yet. (and what on
earth happened to the old list, anyway?)
My problem is this: I'm setting up a software RAID5 across 5 IDE drives.
I'm running Debian Unstable, using kernel 2.6.8-2-k7. I HAVE set
md_component_detection to 1 in lvm.conf, and I wiped the drives after
changing this setting.
I originally set it up as a four-drive RAID, via a 3Ware controller, so my
original devices were sdb, sdc, sdd, and sde. (the machine also has a
hardware raid on an ICP Vortex SCSI controller: this is sda.) In this
mode, it set up and built perfectly. LVM worked exactly as I expected it
to. I had a test volume running. All the queries and volume management
worked exactly correctly. All was well.
So then I tried to add one more drive via the motherboard IDE controller, on
/dev/hda. (note that I stopped the array, wiped the first and last 100 megs
on the drives, and rebuilt. ). That's when the problems started. The RAID
itself seems to build and work just fine, although I haven't waited for the
entire 6 or so hours it will take to completely finish. Build speed is
good, everything seems normal. But LVM blows up badly in this
configuration.
When I do a pvcreate on /dev/md0, it succeeds... but if I do a pvdisplay I
get a bunch of complaints:
jeeves:/etc/lvm# pvdisplay
Found duplicate PV y8pYTtAg0W703Sc8Wiy79mcWU3gHmCFc: using /dev/sde not
/dev/hda
Found duplicate PV y8pYTtAg0W703Sc8Wiy79mcWU3gHmCFc: using /dev/sde not
/dev/hda
--- NEW Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/hda
VG Name
PV Size 931.54 GB
Allocatable NO
PE Size (KByte) 0
Total PE 0
Free PE 0
Allocated PE 0
PV UUID y8pYTt-Ag0W-703S-c8Wi-y79m-cWU3-gHmCFc
It seems to think that /dev/hda is where the PV is, rather than /dev/md0.
(Note, again, I *HAVE* turned the md_component_detection to 1 in lvm.conf!!)
I have erased, using dd, the first and last 100 megs or so on every drive,
and I get exactly the same results every time... even with all RAID and LVM
blocks erased, if I use this list of drives:
/dev/hda
/dev/sdb
/dev/sdc
/dev/sdd
/dev/sde
with the linux MD driver, LVM does not seem to work properly. I think the
component detection is at least a little buggy. This is what my
/proc/mdstat looks like:
jeeves:/etc/lvm# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid5]
md0 : active raid5 sde[5] sdd[3] sdc[2] sdb[1] hda[0]
976793600 blocks level 5, 128k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/4] [UUUU_]
[=>...................] recovery = 6.2% (15208576/244198400)
finish=283.7min speed=13448K/sec
unused devices: <none>
I realize that using both IDE and SCSI drives in the same array is
unusual... but I'm not really using SCSI drives, they just look like that
because of the 3Ware controller.
Again, this works FINE as long as I just use the (fake) SCSI devices.. it
doesn't wonk out until I add in /dev/hda.
Any suggestions? Is this a bug?
next reply other threads:[~2005-02-26 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-26 20:30 Ron Watkins [this message]
2005-02-28 11:15 ` [linux-lvm] Having duplicate PV problems, think there's a bug in LVM2 md component detection go0ogl3
2005-02-28 20:39 ` Ron Watkins
2005-02-28 21:38 ` Luca Berra
2005-02-28 22:29 ` Ron Watkins
2005-03-01 7:38 ` Luca Berra
2005-03-01 14:58 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2005-03-02 18:25 ` [linux-lvm] " Matthias Julius
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002101c51c41$f6bcfdc0$32dcdc0a@vanish' \
--to=linux-lvm@malor.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox