From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <002301bf3c62$82316500$030116ac@fd1> From: "Fernando Dammous" Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM in the Linux kernel Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 23:13:47 -0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0020_01BF3C51.B83EBC80" Sender: owner-linux-lvm Errors-To: owner-linux-lvm List-Id: To: linux-lvm@msede.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01BF3C51.B83EBC80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, Sometimes I am thinking and I fear for my conclusions: Would not Linus Torvalds be the weakest link of that called = Linux-Project? How much of responsibility does he delegate to your closer and reliable collaborators? AFAIK, Alan Cox already included a patch of LVM in an of your ACs. What = the reaction of Linus? Alan's experience was not enough for him? In relation to Linux, which the great innovations that will be present = in the kernel 24? Which your attentions? Plug 'n Play ? Will it be that he doesn't think the inclusion of LVM (ASAP) is it so important? What is important then? To include in the stock kernel such an important subsystem for the = Linux's community like LVM (and how many other?) is it being necessary every = appeal type. I still have a lot of hope and trust.=20 Cheers, Fernando Dammous ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01BF3C51.B83EBC80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

Sometimes I am thinking and I fear = for my=20 conclusions:
Would not Linus Torvalds be the weakest link of that = called=20 Linux-Project?
How much of responsibility does he delegate to your = closer and=20 reliable
collaborators?
AFAIK, Alan Cox already included a patch = of LVM in=20 an of your ACs. What the
reaction of Linus? Alan's experience was not = enough=20 for him?
In relation to Linux, which the great innovations that will = be=20 present in
the kernel 24?
Which your attentions? Plug 'n = Play=20 ?
Will it be that he doesn't think the inclusion of LVM (ASAP) is it=20 so
important? What is important then?
To include in the stock = kernel such=20 an important subsystem for the Linux's
community like LVM (and = how many=20 other?) is it being necessary every appeal
type.

I still have = a lot of=20 hope and trust.
Cheers,
Fernando = Dammous

------=_NextPart_000_0020_01BF3C51.B83EBC80--