From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6QMu0a32531 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:56:00 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.102]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6QMtwe1027191 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:55:58 -0400 Received: from ZACK2 (rdu163-116-062.nc.rr.com [24.163.116.62]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id i6QMtriB009598 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:55:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <003701c47363$bb61ec90$6b02a8c0@ZACK2> From: "Zachary Hamm" References: <001701c46ff1$cdcecc60$6b02a8c0@ZACK2> <20040722153408.GG10840@tykepenguin.com> <001001c47021$9accc800$6b02a8c0@ZACK2> <20040723065607.GB9681@tykepenguin.com> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 and RAID 1 not working on Fedora Core 2 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:56:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development Changed the filter directed as suggested, no joy. I still get the same errors. Any other suggestions, or should I post more config information? There has to be something I'm missing. Zack ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Caulfield" To: "LVM general discussion and development" Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 2:56 AM Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 and RAID 1 not working on Fedora Core 2 > On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 03:25:09PM -0400, Zachary Hamm wrote: > > Thanks for the tip. But "md_component_detection = 1" is already set in my > > lvm.conf file. Any other tips? Perhaps also linked to sometimes getting > > an "out of memory" message when running the user tools? > > > > Did you try the filter? The OOM error is almost certainly caused by the tools > reading an incorrect or corrupt header from the disk, and if your PVs are all MD > devices then there's no reason for LVM to scan the underlying disks. > > patrick > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ >