From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <00d201c2eabc$ade459d0$0100a8c0@voyager> From: "Emiliano Lesende" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C6_01C2EAA3.839082D0" Subject: [linux-lvm] HELP! pvcreate on wrong disk Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Mar 19 08:25:02 2003 List-Id: To: linux-lvm@sistina.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00C6_01C2EAA3.839082D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have four PVs on one LV. I was adding the five disk when by accident I = pvcreate'ed a disk device that was already in the LV. I dont know how = LVM let go through with this, but it did. Consequently the pvscan showed = four PVs, one inactive and with no VG associated with it. Immediatly I = run a vgcfgrestore on the device and everything return to normal, or so = I think? My question is, did the pvcreate erased the data on the disk? = or just the PV header? Can I sleep safely thinking that everything is = ok? Thanks in advance Emiliano ------=_NextPart_000_00C6_01C2EAA3.839082D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have four PVs on one LV. I was adding = the five=20 disk when by accident I pvcreate'ed a disk device that was already in = the LV. I=20 dont know how LVM let go through with this, but it did. Consequently the = pvscan=20 showed four PVs, one inactive and with no VG associated with it. = Immediatly I=20 run a vgcfgrestore on the device and everything return to normal, or so = I think?=20 My question is, did the pvcreate erased the data on the disk? or just = the PV=20 header? Can I sleep safely thinking that everything is ok?
 
Thanks in advance
Emiliano
------=_NextPart_000_00C6_01C2EAA3.839082D0--