linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
To: 'LVM general discussion and development' <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: [linux-lvm] thinpool metadata size
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:21:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c0501cf3e39$0e82e0f0$2b88a2d0$@acm.org> (raw)

While researching thinpool provisioning, it seems one of the issues is that
the size of the metadata is fixed as of creation, and that if the metadata
allocation fills up, your pool is corrupted? In many of the places that
concern was mentioned, it was also said that extending the size of the
metadata lv was a feature coming soon, but I didn't find anything confirming
whether or not that functionality had been released. Is the size of the
metadata lv still fixed?

My intention is to have a 4TB PV (4 x 2TB RAID10), allocated completely to a
thin pool, with the metadata stored separately on a 256G RAID1 of a couple
SSD's (the rest of the SSD mirror will eventually be used for dm-cache when
lvm support for that is released). This storage will be used for
virtualization, with fairly heavy snapshots, where there will be half a
dozen or so template volumes which will be snapshotted when a new vm is
created, then each of those will have some number of snapshots for backup
purposes (although those snapshots will never be written to). Given such a
usage pattern, is there a best practice recommendation for sizing the
metadata lv? It looks like going with the defaults would result in
approximately 3.6G allocated for metadata.

Thanks.

             reply	other threads:[~2014-03-12 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-12 21:21 Paul B. Henson [this message]
2014-03-12 23:35 ` [linux-lvm] thinpool metadata size Mike Snitzer
2014-03-13  1:32   ` Paul B. Henson
2014-03-13 14:01     ` Mike Snitzer
2014-03-14  2:39       ` Paul B. Henson
2014-03-14  5:52         ` matthew patton
2014-03-13 17:20   ` Mike Snitzer
2014-03-14  2:42     ` Paul B. Henson
2014-03-14  3:35       ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='0c0501cf3e39$0e82e0f0$2b88a2d0$@acm.org' \
    --to=henson@acm.org \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).