From: Magnus Sandberg <magnus@switchbeat.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] lvscan and df result differs
Date: Sat Oct 26 18:31:01 2002 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1035675002.11490.15.camel@sleep> (raw)
I have just installed lvm on my debian testing server.
I have finally managed to create a PV on a maxtor
120G disk, the 'pvcreate' command complained about
a partitiontable being present even if there is no
table there.
--8<--
server:~# pvcreate --version
pvcreate: Logical Volume Manager 1.0.4
Heinz Mauelshagen, Sistina Software 02/05/2002 (IOP 10)
--8<--
I managed to get around that by using a v2 lvm command.
Is there a bug in 1.0.x's pvcreate?
I have also managed to create a VG a and a LV and that
seems to work. I have formatted the LV with ext3 and now
the strange thing is that lvscan reports:
--8<--
server:~# lvscan
lvscan -- ACTIVE "/dev/vg/lg" [114.49 GB]
lvscan -- 1 logical volumes with 114.49 GB total in 1 volume group
lvscan -- 1 active logical volumes
--8<--
But when using the filesystem df reports:
--8<--
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hde1 123GB 121GB 2.4GB 99% /store
/dev/vg/lg 122GB 121GB 0 100% /store2
--8<--
/dev/hde1 is also a 120G disk but with resierfs, ext3
takeing up more size is probably normal. But the actual
size on the lvm is 122G and as you can see I can fit
121G on the disk, so why is lvscan reporting ~115G?
Can i safetly use my lvm setup without running the risk
of losing data?
Thanks,
/Magnus
next reply other threads:[~2002-10-26 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-26 18:31 Magnus Sandberg [this message]
2002-10-28 3:07 ` [linux-lvm] lvscan and df result differs Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-10-28 9:24 ` Magnus Sandberg
2002-10-28 9:38 ` James Hawtin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1035675002.11490.15.camel@sleep \
--to=magnus@switchbeat.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox