Linux LVM users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Magnus Sandberg <magnus@switchbeat.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] lvscan and df result differs
Date: Sat Oct 26 18:31:01 2002	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1035675002.11490.15.camel@sleep> (raw)

I have just installed lvm on my debian testing server.

I have finally managed to create a PV on a maxtor 
120G disk, the 'pvcreate' command complained about 
a partitiontable being present even if there is no 
table there.
--8<--
server:~# pvcreate --version
pvcreate: Logical Volume Manager 1.0.4
Heinz Mauelshagen, Sistina Software  02/05/2002 (IOP 10)
--8<--
I managed to get around that by using a v2 lvm command.
Is there a bug in 1.0.x's pvcreate?

I have also managed to create a VG a and a LV and that
seems to work. I have formatted the LV with ext3 and now
the strange thing is that lvscan reports:
--8<--
server:~# lvscan 
lvscan -- ACTIVE            "/dev/vg/lg" [114.49 GB]
lvscan -- 1 logical volumes with 114.49 GB total in 1 volume group
lvscan -- 1 active logical volumes
--8<--
But when using the filesystem df reports:
--8<--
Filesystem             Size   Used  Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hde1             123GB  121GB  2.4GB  99% /store
/dev/vg/lg            122GB  121GB      0 100% /store2
--8<--

/dev/hde1 is also a 120G disk but with resierfs, ext3
takeing up more size is probably normal. But the actual
size on the lvm is 122G and as you can see I can fit 
121G on the disk, so why is lvscan reporting ~115G? 
Can i safetly use my lvm setup without running the risk
of losing data?


Thanks,

/Magnus

             reply	other threads:[~2002-10-26 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-26 18:31 Magnus Sandberg [this message]
2002-10-28  3:07 ` [linux-lvm] lvscan and df result differs Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-10-28  9:24   ` Magnus Sandberg
2002-10-28  9:38     ` James Hawtin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1035675002.11490.15.camel@sleep \
    --to=magnus@switchbeat.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox