From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i81IWn319723
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:32:49 -0400
Received: from storix.com ([206.71.178.18])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i81IWmS0021511
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:32:49 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.126] (65.106.88.139.ptr.us.xo.net [65.106.88.139])
	by storix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A171315832
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Wed,  1 Sep 2004 11:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM and Ghost
From: rich turner <rich@storix.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040901182120.GF7576@percy.comedia.it>
References: <63BAEF7DCB973A469B1A60CBE113C1650872A631@cmss-mail.Tickets.com>
	<20040901152234.GB4300@localhost.localdomain>
	<41360E48.3030709@charter.net> <20040901182120.GF7576@percy.comedia.it>
Message-Id: <1094063612.3399.44.camel@rich>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 11:33:33 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Id: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archives/linux-lvm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>

or you could look at Storix which definitely supports LVM.

On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 11:21, Luca Berra wrote:
> do not hijack other people threads,
> that said, probably norton ghost does not understand lvm.
> you could look at Mondo Rescue (http://www.mondorescue.org/)
> 
> L.
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 01:00:40PM -0500, James P wrote:
> >The only difference I can think of between these machines and our 
> >other Linux boxes that ghost perfectly well is that these are using 
> >LVM. Is this causing the problem with Ghost? Has anyone else run 
> 
> L.