From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iA1M3Wr02523
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 17:03:32 -0500
Received: from email.careercast.com (email.careercast.com [216.39.101.233])
	by mx3.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id iA1M3Kee013774
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 17:03:25 -0500
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Re: Software raid on top of lvm logical volume
From: Clint Byrum <cbyrum@spamaps.org>
In-Reply-To: <44376.64.233.217.29.1099327893.squirrel@64.233.217.29>
References: <41801ADE.6030308@monjoin.net>
	<20041028011738.GD13737@kluge.net>	<41808B37.40406@monjoin.net>
	<20041028063530.GA13279@percy.comedia.it>
	<n6t752-uf2.ln1@triangulo.it.uc3m.es> <41865DE3.6040409@mikebabcock.ca>
	<44376.64.233.217.29.1099327893.squirrel@64.233.217.29>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 14:03:19 -0800
Message-Id: <1099346599.20354.56.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Id: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archives/linux-lvm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Erik@echohome.org, LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>

On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 11:51 -0500, Erik Ohrnberger wrote:
> This solution would seem to be as the holy grail in that it would give you
> the best of all worlds: resizable RAID storage.  Or am I wrong about this
> assumption?
> 

Isn't that what NetApps do already with their "modified RAID4"?