From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAHN0Jr17492 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:00:19 -0500 Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-05.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.37]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id iAHN0BLL000406 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:00:17 -0500 Subject: Re: Re: [linux-lvm] Software RAID 5 Resizing and LVM From: Adam K-F In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-0XYuFc6r4HsJu7FErrnb" Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 07:01:35 +0800 Message-Id: <1100732495.2496.6.camel@Slacktop.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: To: linux-lvm@redhat.com --=-0XYuFc6r4HsJu7FErrnb Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks Jon, What I was trying to achieve was a a single, really big raid drive that I could _easily_ expand later on down the track. It only needs to have the single filesystem on it (i'm going to use reiserfs) which has to be resizable (using resize_reiserfs). So yeah, I ended figuring out what i actally needed to do in the end, after playing with LVM, which incidently was a bit of fun :) I've found an application for it for my other file server. As they say, all's well that ends well :) Adam --=-0XYuFc6r4HsJu7FErrnb Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: Forwarded message - Re: [linux-lvm] Software RAID 5 Resizing and LVM Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: Delivered-To: 47-adam@slackguy.net Received: (qmail 27927 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2004 16:53:11 -0000 Received: from mail.austinlogistics.com (HELO www.austinlogistics.com) (69.150.203.234) by bbw.org.au with SMTP; 17 Nov 2004 16:53:11 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1100647794.419a8d72734bb@webmail.slackguy.net> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Software RAID 5 Resizing and LVM To: adam@slackguy.net X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.4 June 01, 2004 Message-ID: From: Jetkins@austinlogistics.com Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:53:00 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Uni/AustinLogistics(Release 6.0.4|June 01, 2004) at 11/17/2004 10:53:11 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I asked pretty much that exact question on Monday! :) The only difference was that mine is a hardware RAID. Someone replied with a possible workaround if you're using LVM2, but if you're using LVM1 like me, and you pvcreate'd your PV across the entire disk like me, then you're screwed like me. :( If you partitioned the logical disk and pvcreate'd a partition, then you should be able to create a new partition on the newly-available space, then pvcreate a second PV and add it into the VG. The wonders of 20/20 hindsight. Cheers, Jon Etkins IT Administration & Support Austin Logistics, Inc ph: (512) 651-5641 fax: (512) 329-5625 linux-lvm-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 11/16/2004 05:29:54 PM: > I've been playing around with adding disks to a software RAID 5 array, and it > works fine. However, i have LVM running over the top of that and i can't > figure out how to enlarge the Phisical Volume to encompass the newly added > capacity on the raid device. Has anyone achieved this at all? > > Am I barking up the wrong tree here? If so, how would you go about > adding drives > to a software RAID 5 device, and actually adding the new space to > the filesystem > inside the RAID device? > > Thanks in advance > > Adam > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ --=-0XYuFc6r4HsJu7FErrnb--