From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iB730Fr15438 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:00:15 -0500 Received: from desire.voip.primustel.com (_postfix@[208.219.5.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iB7304mT030251 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:00:14 -0500 Received: from cain (benway.cv.telegroup.com [10.40.41.175]) by desire.voip.primustel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C61311C72 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 02:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Huge memory allocation... From: Aran Cox In-Reply-To: <1102368120.3579.67.camel@benway> References: <1102350496.3579.49.camel@benway> <1102368120.3579.67.camel@benway> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 20:26:33 -0600 Message-Id: <1102386393.5390.0.camel@cain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 15:21 -0600, Aran Cox wrote: > On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 10:28 -0600, Aran Cox wrote: > > Could there be metadata lurking on > > that disk that confuses the utilities? > > I basically did a: > pvremove /dev/hdb > Once again I posted too soon. I also had to recreate the partition table on that disk after the pvremove. Still, all's well that ends well I guess. -- Aran Cox