From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] live lock? From: Ming Zhang In-Reply-To: <20050701141235.GH21889@null.msp.redhat.com> References: <1120167747.5505.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050701141235.GH21889@null.msp.redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-0Rsp2vsLfJfOw65SRBOz" Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 10:20:38 -0400 Message-Id: <1120227639.5501.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: mingz@ele.uri.edu, LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: To: AJ Lewis Cc: LVM general discussion and development --=-0Rsp2vsLfJfOw65SRBOz Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 09:12 -0500, AJ Lewis wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 05:42:27PM -0400, Ming Zhang wrote: > Looks like you managed to get two VGs with the name vg1 on your system. = do a > vgrename and see if you can access the inactive one. ('vgrename vg1 vg2'= ) >=20 seems i am pretty cool. :P i dare not to do this because this one running oracle database now. no fix if not broken.=20 ming --=-0Rsp2vsLfJfOw65SRBOz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCxVE2SYbkL5BnVYoRAiReAJwJmnqLire7MdFfbSj4JFl4AXfWiQCffL5U xHCREaT5NYs//Jsu2VkBR+8= =1jQe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-0Rsp2vsLfJfOw65SRBOz--