From: Chris Cox <chris_cox@stercomm.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM limits?
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:08:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1201547294.30560.29.camel@behemoth.csg.stercomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801281801.m0SI10Xi010185@beta.mvs.co.il>
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 20:01 +0200, Ehud Karni wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:38:14 Chris Cox wrote:
> >
> > Ok. But it's really impractical to have large multi-terabyte
> > single filesystem today. What are you wanting to do? Ever fsck a
> > 2TB filesystem? Consider yourself warned.
>
> Just last night I ran fsck on my home 1.5 TB file server (it is software
> RAID-5 - mdadm, built on 7200 RPM, 500GB SATA2 x 4, ext3 without LVM).
> It has went 191 days without fsck so when I booted the machine (I just
> upgraded to 2.6.18-53.1.6.el5) it did the fsck automaticaly.
>
> It took less then 90 minutes.
:) It can vary. I've seen it take days (on infrastructure much
better than what you have).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-28 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-28 10:23 [linux-lvm] LVM limits? Jordi Prats
2008-01-28 19:24 ` Jordi Prats
2008-01-28 17:38 ` Chris Cox
2008-01-28 18:01 ` Ehud Karni
2008-01-28 19:08 ` Chris Cox [this message]
2008-01-28 19:53 ` Vesa-Pekka Palmu
2008-01-28 21:52 ` Joseph L. Casale
2008-01-28 23:38 ` Ehud Karni
2008-01-29 0:27 ` Chris Cox
2008-01-29 10:04 ` Ehud Karni
2008-01-29 16:16 ` Chris Cox
2008-01-29 0:16 ` Jordi Prats
2008-01-28 23:47 ` Jordi Prats
2008-01-29 6:58 ` Michael Eisenkölbl
2008-01-29 17:38 ` Lars Ellenberg
2008-02-01 5:40 ` David Robinson
2008-02-01 13:08 ` [linux-lvm] LVM limits? OT Steeve McCauley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1201547294.30560.29.camel@behemoth.csg.stercomm.com \
--to=chris_cox@stercomm.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).