From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [10.33.0.40] (breeves.fab.redhat.com [10.33.0.40]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6MCx2rf027095 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:59:02 -0400 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Can't mount or run fdisk on an existing logical volume, help! From: "Bryn M. Reeves" In-Reply-To: <4A66A30F.1020906@cox.net> References: <2473b43f0907211255u7c116b1er9c3483bec2472cd@mail.gmail.com> <20090721195830.GA30206@esri.com> <4A66A30F.1020906@cox.net> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:05:06 +0100 Message-Id: <1248267906.14407.118.camel@breeves.fab.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 00:26 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 2009-07-21 14:58, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:55:50PM -0700, Adam Olsen wrote: > >> This pretty much sums it up: > >> > >> imgserv:/storage/# lvscan > >> ACTIVE '/dev/storage/storage' [3.62 TB] inherit > >> imgserv:/storage/# fdisk /dev/storage/storage > >> > > But doesn't fdisk only work on *physical* block devices? > > IOW, why fdisk an lv ? > You're using it as the backing store for a whole-disk image, e.g. for a virtualised OS instance? Bryn.