From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.9]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8GGm4YR023130 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:48:04 -0400 Received: from interhosting.it (smtpauth.interfree.it [213.158.72.43]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id n8GGlpkd008228 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:47:52 -0400 Received: from delo.gdit (delo.gdit [127.0.0.1]) by delo.gdit (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8GGloP3019393 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:47:50 +0200 Received: (from root@localhost) by delo.gdit (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n8GGlnVl019391 for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:47:49 +0200 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Using LVM Mirroring to obtain a usable backup From: Ambrogio De Lorenzo In-Reply-To: <20090916170533.62999698@fixlaptop.gillibert.homelinux.net> References: <1253109566.5326.15.camel@delo.gdit> <20090916170533.62999698@fixlaptop.gillibert.homelinux.net> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:47:49 +0200 Message-Id: <1253119669.5326.32.camel@delo.gdit> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: LVM general discussion and development Il giorno mer, 16/09/2009 alle 17.05 +0200, Andr=C3=A9 Gillibert ha scritto: > Mirroring is software RAID1. > What you want looks like LVM snapshots. > See LVM HOWTO to see how to create snapshots. > A backup may be a good thing to do, too. snapshot is not a good choise for me. I want to have an identical copy (like dd) on another identical disk, for fast recovery in case of failure. This is what I do with raid hardware, and I would like to know if is possible to do it with lvm mirroring. I'm looking also on mdadm to mirror a disk (or partition) but I think it is not usable when disk is already partitioned and used without mdadm. Backup is good but is not a good choise in this case, because a full restore is a long process Tnx Ambrogio