From: Chris Cox <chris_cox@stercomm.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm versus Veritas VxVM?
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:12:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282936348.21816.154.camel@geeko> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin5W9M=g9Mjn9xGVxA1QErCsbXzYfc8Qswainhn@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 14:47 -0400, Jon Price wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How does lvm compare to Veritas VxVM?
IMHO, the toolset with lvm2 is simpler to understand.
And of course, lvm2 is free!!!!
With that said, I haven't tried clvm... I've only done clustering using
VxVM. Also, VxVM has PLATFORM LIMITATIONS... so it's not supported as
well as lvm2 which is almost everywhere (Linux wise).
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-27 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-27 18:47 [linux-lvm] lvm versus Veritas VxVM? Jon Price
2010-08-27 19:12 ` Chris Cox [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1282936348.21816.154.camel@geeko \
--to=chris_cox@stercomm.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).