* [linux-lvm] lvm versus Veritas VxVM?
@ 2010-08-27 18:47 Jon Price
2010-08-27 19:12 ` Chris Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jon Price @ 2010-08-27 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 52 bytes --]
Hi,
How does lvm compare to Veritas VxVM?
Tx,
Jon
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 147 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] lvm versus Veritas VxVM?
2010-08-27 18:47 [linux-lvm] lvm versus Veritas VxVM? Jon Price
@ 2010-08-27 19:12 ` Chris Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Cox @ 2010-08-27 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LVM general discussion and development
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 14:47 -0400, Jon Price wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How does lvm compare to Veritas VxVM?
IMHO, the toolset with lvm2 is simpler to understand.
And of course, lvm2 is free!!!!
With that said, I haven't tried clvm... I've only done clustering using
VxVM. Also, VxVM has PLATFORM LIMITATIONS... so it's not supported as
well as lvm2 which is almost everywhere (Linux wise).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-27 19:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-27 18:47 [linux-lvm] lvm versus Veritas VxVM? Jon Price
2010-08-27 19:12 ` Chris Cox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).