From: Zhao Heming <heming.zhao@suse.com>
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
Cc: ematsumiya@suse.com, Zhao Heming <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Subject: [linux-lvm] [PATCH v3] lvdisplay: dispaly correct status when underlying devs missing
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 13:32:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1598074364-21814-1-git-send-email-heming.zhao@suse.com> (raw)
reproducible steps:
1. vgcreate vg1 /dev/sda /dev/sdb
2. lvcreate --type raid0 -l 100%FREE -n raid0lv vg1
3. do remove the /dev/sdb action
4. lvdisplay show wrong 'LV Status'
After removing raid0 type LV underlying dev, lvdisplay still display
'available'. This is wrong status for raid0.
This patch add a new function raid_is_available(), which will handle
all raid case.
With this patch, lvdisplay will show
from:
LV Status available
to:
LV Status NOT available (partial)
Reviewed-by: Enzo Matsumiya <ematsumiya@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Heming <heming.zhao@suse.com>
---
v3:
- change patch title
from:
dispaly partial when underlying devs missing
to:
dispaly correct status when underlying devs missing
- add new function raid_is_available(), which can handle all raid type
- add reviewed info: Enzo Matsumiya
v2:
- add special handle for raid0 type.
- print 'partial' if lv is partial status.
- change comments, add raid0 & other raid types cases.
---
lib/display/display.c | 13 +++++++++---
lib/metadata/segtype.h | 1 +
lib/raid/raid.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/display/display.c b/lib/display/display.c
index 36c9879..3bb570f 100644
--- a/lib/display/display.c
+++ b/lib/display/display.c
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ int lvdisplay_full(struct cmd_context *cmd,
void *handle __attribute__((unused)))
{
struct lvinfo info;
- int inkernel, snap_active = 0;
+ int inkernel, snap_active = 0, partial = 0, raid_is_avail = 1;
char uuid[64] __attribute__((aligned(8)));
const char *access_str;
struct lv_segment *snap_seg = NULL, *mirror_seg = NULL;
@@ -553,11 +553,18 @@ int lvdisplay_full(struct cmd_context *cmd,
log_print("LV VDO Pool name %s", seg_lv(seg, 0)->name);
}
+ if (lv_is_partial(lv)) {
+ partial = 1;
+ if (lv_is_raid(lv))
+ raid_is_avail = raid_is_available(lv) ? 1 : 0;
+ }
+
if (inkernel && info.suspended)
log_print("LV Status suspended");
else if (activation())
- log_print("LV Status %savailable",
- inkernel ? "" : "NOT ");
+ log_print("LV Status %savailable %s",
+ (inkernel && raid_is_avail) ? "" : "NOT ",
+ partial ? "(partial)" : "");
/********* FIXME lv_number
log_print("LV # %u", lv->lv_number + 1);
diff --git a/lib/metadata/segtype.h b/lib/metadata/segtype.h
index 08ddc35..1a84070 100644
--- a/lib/metadata/segtype.h
+++ b/lib/metadata/segtype.h
@@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ struct segment_type *init_unknown_segtype(struct cmd_context *cmd,
#ifdef RAID_INTERNAL
int init_raid_segtypes(struct cmd_context *cmd, struct segtype_library *seglib);
+bool raid_is_available(const struct logical_volume *lv);
#endif
#define THIN_FEATURE_DISCARDS (1U << 0)
diff --git a/lib/raid/raid.c b/lib/raid/raid.c
index e88a154..4ed77e9 100644
--- a/lib/raid/raid.c
+++ b/lib/raid/raid.c
@@ -25,6 +25,60 @@
#include "lib/metadata/metadata.h"
#include "lib/metadata/lv_alloc.h"
+/*
+ * below case think as available, return true:
+ * - raid 1:@least 1 disk live
+ * - raid 10: loose 1 disk
+ * - raid 4/5: loose 1 disk
+ * - raid 6: loose 2 disk
+ *
+ * raid 0: if there is any disk loose, return false
+ * */
+bool raid_is_available(const struct logical_volume *lv)
+{
+ int s, missing_pv = 0, exist_pv = 0;
+ bool ret = true;
+ struct lv_segment *seg = NULL;
+
+ dm_list_iterate_items(seg, &lv->segments) {
+ for (s = 0; s < seg->area_count; ++s) {
+ if (seg_type(seg, s) == AREA_LV) {
+ if (seg_lv(seg, s)->status & PARTIAL_LV)
+ missing_pv++;
+ else
+ exist_pv++;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ if (seg_is_any_raid0(first_seg(lv))){
+ ret = missing_pv ? false : true;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ if (seg_is_raid1(first_seg(lv))){
+ ret = exist_pv ? true : false;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ if (seg_is_any_raid10(first_seg(lv))) {
+ ret = (missing_pv > 1) ? false : true;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ if (seg_is_raid4(first_seg(lv))) {
+ ret = (missing_pv > 1) ? false : true;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ if (seg_is_any_raid5(first_seg(lv))) {
+ ret = (missing_pv > 1) ? false : true;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ if (seg_is_any_raid6(first_seg(lv))) {
+ ret = (missing_pv > 2) ? false : true;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+out:
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int _raid_target_present(struct cmd_context *cmd,
const struct lv_segment *seg __attribute__((unused)),
unsigned *attributes);
--
1.8.3.1
reply other threads:[~2020-08-22 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1598074364-21814-1-git-send-email-heming.zhao@suse.com \
--to=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=ematsumiya@suse.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).