From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@researchut.com>
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM + Multipathing
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:00:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <186ra4-8hp.ln1@www.researchut.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20070220061150.GA3215@percy.comedia.it
Luca Berra wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 09:52:27PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I have a question regarding the combination of LVM + Multipathing in a SAN
>>environment.
>>
>>I have a LUN mapped to a host using iSCSI. I have two two paths to the LUN.
>>This setup, using multipathing, provides me failover functionality.
>>
>>My question is how does LVM react to path failures ?
>>In a failover environment, multipathing can take upto 120 seconds to detect
>>that the active path to the LUN is no more available and then switch to the
>>secondary path. During this 120 seconds, how does LVM react ? Does it really
>>sense that the device is offlined ? Or that information is never passed to LVM
>>and it just allows I/O to happen leaving that responsibility to the
>>multipathing layer ?
>
> i believe LVM does not react at all.
>
I brought this question because I'm seeing Filesystem READONLY issues when doing
a takeover/giveback.
My understanding is that a filesystem usually goes read-only, only when it
senses errors in the drive. Now I believe LVM might the culprit because beneath
the filesystem and above the block device, LVM is the only layer.
Thanks,
Ritesh
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."
"Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is research."
"The great are those who achieve the impossible, the petty are those who
cannot - rrs"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-20 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-17 16:22 [linux-lvm] LVM + Multipathing Ritesh Raj Sarraf
2007-02-20 6:11 ` Luca Berra
2007-02-20 12:30 ` Ritesh Raj Sarraf [this message]
2007-02-20 13:19 ` [linux-lvm] " Luca Berra
2007-02-20 14:49 ` [linux-lvm] " Ritesh Raj Sarraf
2007-02-28 18:30 ` Dave Wysochanski
2007-02-20 17:03 ` [linux-lvm] " Matt P
2007-02-20 17:13 ` Christian.Rohrmeier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=186ra4-8hp.ln1@www.researchut.com \
--to=rrs@researchut.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).