From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 References: <574CB690.5030401@partidopirata.com.ar> <574D8EE6.8020903@partidopirata.com.ar> <5750371C.2070201@partidopirata.com.ar> <603e0110-8de8-3c03-bf93-db0c19c2d4e0@redhat.com> <57504C3B.70303@partidopirata.com.ar> From: Zdenek Kabelac Message-ID: <1b83651a-db90-cfbf-4d2d-6cf571cebece@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 17:20:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57504C3B.70303@partidopirata.com.ar> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] [dm-crypt] LVM on LUKS: volumes missing Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: fauno , linux-lvm@redhat.com Dne 2.6.2016 v 17:09 fauno napsal(a): > On 02/06/16 11:50, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > >> >> Hi >> >> This was not a full lvm2 -vvvv trace output - unless you would be using >> a modified lvm2 source code base. >> >> 'pvscan -vvvv --cache device &>out' >> >> >> Also please provide full lvm2 package version eventually reference to >> package >> with sources (and extra patches) (link). > > > i can't confirm the version now, but it was lvm2 from trisquel belenos > (ubuntu trusty, lvm2 2.02.98 it seems[^0]), the hd was running archlinux > with latest lvm2 from repos. i can try later with a more modern lvm2. > > the pvscan output was exactly that though, i just selected it from the > terminal i was using. see it finished with error 5, perhaps that's why > it's incomplete? > > > thanks! > So in your case any usage of lvmetad seems rather irrelevant. (it's been freshly deployed daemon in that age for testing...) It's unclear where have you get use_lvmpolld in your config file since I'm sure it's not been in 2.02.98 (introduced around 2.02.120) So are you mixing usage of various lvm2 versions ? What does 'vgscan -vvvv' shows on decrypted partition? Also please provide output of: dmsetup table dmsetup status And yeah 2.02.98 is somewhat out-of-date.... (Make sure your systems' & initramdisk version are somewhat matching) Regards Zdenek