From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jBBFX6107201 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:33:06 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBBFWxHF010211 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:32:59 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i1so1519305wra for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:32:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1cbd6f830512110732h3e5a666du881f6c4fad593924@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:32:59 -0500 From: Mag Gam Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM onFly features In-Reply-To: <1134310136.26999.4.camel@pc7.dolda2000.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline References: <1cbd6f830512101138t10ec4f77j217ee8830a60a97b@mail.gmail.com> <20051210202232.GG3103@mjk.myfqdn.de> <64AE95D76D81F71989D42E79@dhcp-2-206.wgops.com> <20051210223139.GI3103@mjk.myfqdn.de> <208D3DC6840704A034151D63@dhcp-2-206.wgops.com> <20051210230341.GJ3103@mjk.myfqdn.de> <1cbd6f830512101938g4ec7d36dq4fd9a081658edf47@mail.gmail.com> <1134310136.26999.4.camel@pc7.dolda2000.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development I know AIX LVM and FS act usually as one. Thats where I was going at.... But, thats everyone for their replies! On 12/11/05, Fredrik Tolf wrote: > On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 22:38 -0500, Mag Gam wrote: > > thanks everyone for their kind replies. > > > > So, will LVM and FS (ext2/3 in particular )ever be considered as 1? > > This would be nice for ease of devt. > > If they would be considered as one, it wouldn't be LVM anymore. LVM is a > pure block device layer, and as such will always have to FS layered > above. > > However, stuff like Solaris ZFS does make sense, too, if you ask me. > Having a filesystem managing several block devices allows for pretty > neat stuff, such as per-file replication or striping, which would be > really sweet. > > That said, such a thing would, of course, be completely unrelated to > LVM. > > Fredrik Tolf > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ >