From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <200006272243.AAA11040@e35.marxmeier.com> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Mailing list Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 0:43:17 MESZ In-Reply-To: <395922BD.1595B816@inet.net.nz>; from "Dale Kemp" at Jun 28, 100 9:55 am From: Michael Marxmeier Sender: owner-linux-lvm Errors-To: owner-linux-lvm List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: dale@inet.net.nz Cc: linux-lvm@msede.com > Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote: > > > May I suggest that the "reply to" address be the mailing list instead of the > > sender? > > At the moment, when you reply, it's to the sender so, if you don't pay > > attention, the thread is no more sent to everybody in the list. > > Comments? > > -jec > > > > I agree. > > -- Dale. Some thoughts: OTOH that's why mail programs usually implement a reply and a "reply all" or "group reply". If the reply-to does not point to the list this allows a participant more easy control. In addition, some mailer tend to hide the sender address so it is not that easy to respond privatly. That said, i personally don't disagree with this request. Any differing opinions or strong feelings about this? Michael -- Michael Marxmeier Marxmeier Software AG E-Mail: mike@msede.com Besenbruchstrasse 9 Phone : +49 202 2431440 42285 Wuppertal, Germany Fax : +49 202 2431420 http://www.msede.com/