From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
linux-lvm@msede.com, marcelo@conectiva.com.br,
"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM 2.2 snapshot bug
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 17:04:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001107170420.D12477@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001107174504.A5834@inspiron.suse.de>; from andrea@suse.de on Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 05:45:04PM +0100
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 05:45:04PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 03:56:59PM +0100, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > That's a bit much to type in by hand ... and it's basically
> > kjournald being confused by all its writes failing on a RW
> > block device.
>
> So ext3 will crash also if I/O errors happen during the log reply. The Oopses
> seems due an _ext3_ bug (not due the missing ro_bits in the LVM snapshot)
> as far I can tell.
The current ext3 includes debugging code to trap invariants which the
filesystem expects to be guaranteed, and it's entirely possible that
their over-cautious checking is trapping on such failed writes. Send
me an oops and I can deal with it.
> > Indeed this is the case. When the block device is read-write
> > (the is_read_only(blk_dev) is non-true) it tries to replay
> > the log, even for a read-only mounted FS.
>
> Ok, I agree it's a minor LVM bug, but again I can't see how that minor bug can
> cause oopses and I think setting ro_bits won't fix the real bug but it will
> only hide it.
It's a major bug as far as ext3 is concerned, because filesystem
recovery is a critical prerequisite for mounting a filesystem, and
that requires write access. ext3 has to be able to trust the ro bits
in order to know whether it is safe to perform recovery writes for a
mount, or whether the mount must be rejected because recovery cannot
take place.
Cheers,
Stephen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-07 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-07 10:55 [linux-lvm] LVM 2.2 snapshot bug Rik van Riel
2000-11-07 12:16 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2000-11-07 14:42 ` Rik van Riel
2000-11-07 13:21 ` [linux-lvm] " Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-07 14:56 ` Rik van Riel
2000-11-07 16:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-07 17:04 ` Stephen C. Tweedie [this message]
2000-11-07 19:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-07 20:36 ` Andreas Dilger
2000-11-08 11:11 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-11-08 16:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-08 19:08 ` Andreas Dilger
2000-11-08 11:10 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-11-08 16:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-07 23:04 ` Rik van Riel
2000-11-08 7:55 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2000-11-08 13:44 ` Rik van Riel
2000-11-08 16:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] ` <898720000.973701988@coffee>
2000-11-08 17:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-08 19:11 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001107170420.D12477@redhat.com \
--to=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-lvm@msede.com \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox