Linux LVM users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heinz J. Mauelshagen <Heinz.Mauelshagen@t-online.de>
To: Chewie <chewie@wookimus.net>
Cc: linux-lvm@msede.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] 0.9 next week?!  Cool!
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 15:29:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001112152954.K32147@srv.t-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001111121151.B7541@wookimus.net>; from chewie@wookimus.net on Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 12:11:51PM -0600

On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 12:11:51PM -0600, Chewie wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 01:13:48PM +0000, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:
> > > How long will it take before 0.9 arrives?
> > I am planing for next monday :-)
> 
> Woohoo!  Thankyou, Heinz, for your hard work!  

;-)

> 
> I have a request for you.  *PLEASE* don't use odd version names like
> 0.9final, or Linus' faux paux with the "-test10-pre8" horror. ;-)
> Have you considered using a kernel-like versioning rule, where the
> minor (second) number is odd for development branch and even for the
> stable branch.  Yes, 0.7.131 may seem quite boring, but when 0.8 rolls
> around, we'll know it's the first of the stable versions.  Any 0.8.x
> versions would obviously be patch fixes to the stable version.  

O.k.

Because there is already a lot of references out there to 0.9
0.9 I stay with it for now and will use 0.9.x for fixes.

Starting with 1.0 next year I'll switch to 1.0.x for stable and 1.1.x
for development.

> 
> Regardless, have you been holding out with 0.9 for so long because
> you'd like it to be "stable" from its release point?

That's part of the truth.
There where some private reasons too.

> With that in
> mind, would you consider releasing 0.9 as 0.10?

See above.

> 
> Again, thanks!

You're welcome!

> 
> -- 
> Chad "^chewie, gunnarr" Walstrom <chewie@wookimus.net>
>              http://www.wookimus.net/

-- 

Regards,
Heinz      -- The LVM guy --

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Heinz Mauelshagen                                 Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer                       Bartningstr. 12
                                                  64289 Darmstadt
                                                  Germany
Mauelshagen@Sistina.com                           +49 6151 7103 86
                                                       FAX 7103 96
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

  reply	other threads:[~2000-11-12 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-11-10 10:18 [linux-lvm] 2.2.17 Kernel patch + 0.8 user tools dirk.derycke
2000-11-11 13:13 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2000-11-11 18:11   ` [linux-lvm] 0.9 next week?! Cool! Chewie
2000-11-12 15:29     ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen [this message]
2000-11-11 17:59 ` [linux-lvm] 2.2.17 Kernel patch + 0.8 user tools Chewie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20001112152954.K32147@srv.t-online.de \
    --to=heinz.mauelshagen@t-online.de \
    --cc=Mauelshagen@sistina.com \
    --cc=chewie@wookimus.net \
    --cc=linux-lvm@msede.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox