Re: [linux-lvm] Debian packaging

[lewis@sistina.com]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1451 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 08:53:29AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > Think PATH - this is really easy, and shells already support it.  No more
> > > work to be done, and it's not ugly.  The IOP version will probably never
> > > change within a boot (unless LVM is a module and it gets upgraded without
> > > upgrading the kernel - unlikely).
> >
> > Shouldnt the debian alternatives mechanism (see "man 8
> > update-alternatives") be most appropriate for this task?
> 
> Update-alternatives doesn't work when the file-system in question is mounted 
> read-only.  Also it's not really designed to be run at every boot.
> 
> PATH is a bad idea IMHO.  It is set in too many places and has too many 
> possibilities to be stuffed up.

Doesn't the liblvm.so versioning in the cvs code take care of this problem?

-- 
AJ Lewis
Sistina Software Inc.                  Voice:  612-379-3951
1313 5th St SE, Suite 111              Fax:    612-379-3952
Minneapolis, MN 55414                  E-Mail: lewis@sistina.com
http://www.sistina.com

Current GPG fingerprint = 3B5F 6011 5216 76A5 2F6B  52A0 941E 1261 0029 2648
Get my key at: http://www.sistina.com/~lewis/gpgkey
 (Unfortunately, the PKS-type keyservers do not work with multiple sub-keys)
-----Begin Obligatory Humorous Quote----------------------------------------
No-one suspects the butterfly!
-----End Obligatory Humorous Quote------------------------------------------

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]