From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <declerck@sistina.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] nagging about the LVM usage survey 
In-Reply-To: Message from Christoph Hellwig <hch@ns.caldera.de> 
   of "Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:38:17 +0100." <20010111153817.A25307@caldera.de> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:14:15 -0800
From: "Michael J. Declerck" <declerck@sistina.com>
Message-Id: <20010111151415.210ABE0B7@wraith>
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com, Matthew O'Keefe <okeefe@brule.borg.umn.edu>

I believe that Matt meant LVM 1.0 and GFS 5.0

hch@ns.caldera.de said:
> Why 5.0? 


---
Michael Declerck, declerck@sistina.com   +1.510.823.7991