Re: [linux-lvm] LVM 0.9.1beta1 vgscan segfault when run with -d

[Charles Duffy <cduffy@mvista.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1414 bytes --]

No, I am not using devfs.

Yes, I ran 'vgscan -d'. Indeed, I meant to attach the associated log
(unless it was stripped by the list software). I'll try again.

Also, I misreported the version number. It was 0.9.1beta1 under which
this occured.

On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 12:11:43PM +0000, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:
> 
> Charles, is this under devfs?
> Side remark: you probably run "vgscan -d", right?
> 
> Didn't get the attachement, sorry. Send it again please.
> 
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 10:36:00PM -0800, Charles Duffy wrote:
> > Howdy. I'm experiencing some difficulties while transitioning from LVM
> > 0.8i to 0.9.
> > 
> > vgscan reports:
> > 
> > vgscan -- ERROR "vg_read_with_pv_and_lv(): allocated LE of LV": can't
> > get data of volume group "vg01" from physical volume(s)
> > 
> > When I try to recieve more info (by running vgscan with "-D"), I
> > recieve a segfault.
> > 
> > This appears to be happening inside pv_read_uuidlist, at the memset on
> > line 91 (I added some extra debug() calls to determine this). The
> > attached log (from the original, unpatched version) should help by
> > giving some context.
> > 
> > Frankly, I don't know why this is happening -- more than sufficient
> > space appears to be allocated beforehand -- but, as long as one rules
> > out a bug in debug(), I don't see any other way 'round it.
> > 
> > Thanks for your help.

[-- Attachment #1.2: lvmlog.bz2 --]
[-- Type: application/x-bzip2, Size: 2095 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]