From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:39:42 +0000 From: "Heinz J. Mauelshagen" Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Recommended LVM Version for 2.4.0 Message-ID: <20010129163942.L8567@srv.sistina.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: ; from Holger.Rauch@heitec.de on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:03:45AM +0100 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@Sistina.com Please go for 0.9.1 beta3 we released on 25/01/2001 and don't forget to patch the kernel even though LVM is already included which will update it to the actual LVM release. In order to patch, please follow the instructions in the PATCHES/README file of the LVM distribution. On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:03:45AM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote: > Hi! > > Which version of the LVM would you recommend using in conjunction with a > 2.4.0 kernel? From what I know, only some 0.8 intermediate release seems > to be shipped with 2.4.0, and that release is rather old? Is there any > newer version that seems to work well with 2.4.0? > > Thanks in advance for any hints! > > Greetings, > > Holger > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@sistina.com > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm -- Regards, Heinz -- The LVM Guy -- *** Software bugs are stupid. Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them *** =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc. Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11 56242 Marienrachdorf Germany Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200 FAX 924446 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-