From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 01:19:03 +0200 From: Goetz Bock Message-ID: <20010412011903.A29066@dragon.blacknet.de> References: <20010411121023.A27988@dragon.blacknet.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010411121023.A27988@dragon.blacknet.de>; from lvm@blacknet.de on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 12:10:23PM +0200 Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM 0.9.1_beta7 on RAID-2.2.19-A1 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: To: linux-lvm@sistina.com --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Apr 11 '01 at 12:10, Goetz Bock wrote: > I've once again tried to get the newst LVM code to patch with the new RAID > code, but I've failed. > [ ... ] Sorry for, again, making a fool out of me for not reading the README, again. I now have a cleen patch, but hast anybody tested it? Or should I simply try it, i should probably make a backup first ... damnit, no way to make a backup of 400GB. I must build me a test system to try all this kernels. Cu, Goetz. --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE61OZnf5srOMkjkQoRAiBWAJ9YI8SdHSCtWf5VCGLVnCGRZadfqwCg5BIz 3ml0vC2AOxOuoQqN5cxQteE= =9+yY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--