From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <wichert@cistron.nl>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 15:42:46 +0200
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM and DRDB
Message-ID: <20010420154246.R13067@cistron.nl>
References: <20010420111022.C6133@cistron.nl> <200104201031.f3KAVT05030575@webber.adilger.int> <20010420123624.F13067@cistron.nl> <d3y9svheu9.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d3y9svheu9.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch>; from jes@linuxcare.com on Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 03:37:34PM +0200
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com, linux-openlvm@nl.linux.org

Previously Jes Sorensen wrote:
> For a file system that size you might want to look at XFS instead.

How stable is XFS compared to ext3 and reiserfs? For this system
minimum downtime is very important..

Guess I'll have to add XFS to the things-to-test-soon list.

Wichert.

-- 
   ________________________________________________________________
 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@cistron.nl                  http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |