From: "Heinz J. Mauelshagen" <Mauelshagen@sistina.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM Questions
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 11:15:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010503111544.A4700@sistina.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3AF0B857.74F16371@home.com>; from banal@home.com on Wed, May 02, 2001 at 06:45:59PM -0700
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 06:45:59PM -0700, Evan Day wrote:
> Darren Young wrote:
> > First, does LVM do RAID or do I need to employ the md
> > driver to accomplish this? It seems to me (as a
> > sysadmin) that LVM is great for adding space when
> > needed, but having RAID capabilities in conjunction
> > with this would be required to produce a highly
> > available system.
>
> LVM doesn't do RAID right now - you can use either a hardware
> RAID or the kernel's built-in RAID support (raid 0, 1, and 5).
Evan is right for RAID > 0.
RAID 0 is supported in Linux LVM natively.
You could for eg. address your availability needs with MD or hardware RAID
*and* your performance needs at the same time by setting up RAID 0 logical
volumes striped over a bunch of RAID subsystem based physical volumes.
>
> > What ext2 resize utility is the ideal choice for LVM
> > to use. parted seems to be quite functional, but
> > having to down the machine to single is a but
> > annoying. Has anyone successfully used the ext2online
> > utility on RedHat? It seems as though the version of
> > e2fsprogs that includes this code is part of RH 7.1
> > anyways. At least from what I can tell. The online
> > resizing would definitely be required for a highly
> > available system as well.
>
> I don't have much experience with ext2 resizing, but the
> reiserfs can easily be extended. I'm not sure if it is
> supported or not, but I've actually extended filesystems
> while mounted with no ill effects.
>
> Reiserfs support is built in to kernel 2.4.X.
WRT ext2 you could give Andreas Dilger's ext2resize GNU software a try.
Please look for it at http://ext2resize.sourceforge.net/.
>
> > I started with RedHat 7.1 with the 2.4.2 kernel and
> > patched it. What kernel is ideal to use with LVM? This
> > one seems to work, but I read a reference in the list
> > archive that certain components are in 2.4. Is this
> > the case?
>
> The 2.4.X kernel contains base LVM support, but you'll need
> to supplement that with patches at the same level as the
> LVM user-level tools. Current release is 0.9.1b7.
FYI: You can get the actual GNU LVM code at www.sistina.com/lvm.
>
> > I also read an older thread on an X11 GUI as well as
> > some replies to it. The GUI that comes with Veritas is
> > completely useless and the command line tools are
> > completely over-engineered. While it would be nice for
> > a small company trying to save money not to call in a
> > specialist to create VG's, it certainly wouldn't be a
> > requirement. Get everything stable, reliable and
> > consistent than someone will probably have the time to
> > create the GUI. I'd dedicate time to that type of
> > project, but why bother when the code isn't quite
> > there yet. There's no reason.
>
> LVM is so simple that, IMHO, a GUI shouldn't be an overriding
> concern. Then again, I've been working with LVM on HP-UX
> for many years, and I find the CLI utilities to be much
> more efficient than waiting for SAM (the HP-UX sysadmin
> GUI) to poll everything, build displays, etc. The current
> CLI tools are lean and aligned with the LVM model in a
> way that is both logical and easy to understand.
Thanks for the flowers :-)
Actually there are GUI contributions out there.
For eg. http://www.xs4all.nl/~mmj/lvm/ is worth trying in order to have
the day by day LVM work items covered.
BTW: Evan is touching another major point here, which people tend to forget
easily IMHO; in critical operating situations where you are limited to
the command line (single user) you *need* to be familiar with the CLI in order
to get back to regular operation as fast as possible!
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
--
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-03 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-03 0:48 [linux-lvm] LVM Questions Darren Young
2001-05-03 1:26 ` Glenn Shannon
2001-05-03 1:45 ` Evan Day
2001-05-03 6:56 ` Adrian Phillips
2001-05-04 9:33 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-05-04 7:45 ` Adrian Phillips
2001-05-04 10:38 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-05-04 9:38 ` Adrian Phillips
2001-05-04 13:39 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen
2001-05-08 7:38 ` [linux-lvm] (no subject) Merence Sibomana
2001-05-03 11:15 ` Heinz J. Mauelshagen [this message]
2001-05-03 11:41 ` [linux-lvm] LVM Questions Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
2001-05-04 1:59 ` Mark van Walraven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-29 16:55 [linux-lvm] LVM questions Eric A. Hall
2007-03-29 17:38 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2007-04-20 13:36 ` Nix
2008-03-27 22:27 [linux-lvm] LVM Questions Nicholas Muguira
2008-04-02 8:20 ` Jordi Prats
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010503111544.A4700@sistina.com \
--to=mauelshagen@sistina.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).