From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 20:40:03 +0200 From: Peter Bartosch Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Re: [reiserfs-list] lvm-list pointed to reiserfs: fs/lvm-problems? Message-ID: <20010531204003.A806@mind.bartosch.net> References: <20010528183105.C924@mind.bartosch.net> <15123.55304.751997.122954@crimson.namesys.com> <20010529222304.A4888@mind.bartosch.net> <15124.56124.422024.340431@crimson.namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15124.56124.422024.340431@crimson.namesys.com>; from zam@namesys.com on Wed, May 30, 2001 at 03:36:28PM +0400 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com, linux-lvm@sistina.com Hi! > >> > >> Sorry, but it looks for me like a lvm problem. Can you test you LV by > >> coping some random data (~ 64 MB) to a file in reliable location and > >> to LV, and compare them (or md5 hashes) after reboot ? > > PB> hmm, i haven't really tried another filesystem, maybe i should try ext2? > > Yes, try to run this script over ext2: > http://namesys.com/stress.sh i've done that, but it gave me some cruel errors - like an ext2 panic or so (can't find anything about it in the logs) anyway - the PC was frozen after the reboot e2fsck showed me that: Inode 1313467 has imagic flag set. Clear? yes Inode 1313468 is in use, but has dtime set. Fix? yes and - of course not only once :-( but hundred times > >> Same reason (damaged data), I think, prevented reiserfs volume from > >> mounting. > > PB> yes you're right - but why does it oops when i _only_ want to do an "ls > PB> -l"? > > I agree with you, such behaviour is not good, but I do not think > that you want to run reiserfs on an unstable block device. it's (mostly) only because of the fschk-times -- this is (or should be) an 125GB directory tree for music the next step i'll do ist to give the new kernel (2.4.5) a try (hmm, eventually with ac4-patch - i've read that there are some reiserfs-issues are solved ...) thanks for your attention :wq - until next mail B-), l8r Peter -- :~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ peter@bartosch.net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~: : student of technical computer science : : university of applied sciences krefeld (germany) : ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ FD314F21 C7 AE 2F 28 C1 33 71 77 0D 77 CD 6E 58 E9 06 6B