From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 00:18:37 +0200 From: Goetz Bock Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] HowTo: EIDE/ATA-100 + RAID 1 + LVM Message-ID: <20010629001837.K16466@dragon.blacknet.de> References: <8F120FA493CAD743B30EEB8F356985B5BB57D5@AUSXMBT102VS1.amer.dell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TC23+W66xmFESAX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8F120FA493CAD743B30EEB8F356985B5BB57D5@AUSXMBT102VS1.amer.dell.com>; from Robert_Macaulay@Dell.com on Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:46:10PM -0500 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: To: linux-lvm@sistina.com --6TC23+W66xmFESAX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 28 '01 at 16:46, Robert_Macaulay@Dell.com wrote: > I had a 4G RAM box(HIMEM64 enabled) with Hardware RAID 1 and LVM beta7, > kernel is from RH 7.1, version 2.4.3-6. What kind of hardware raid? If it wasn't such a fake IDE one (or a 3ware encalade), I would have sticked with it. =20 =20 > [ ... ] > I know I changed 2 variables(RAM and RAID). I'm going to go back to HW ra= id > 1 for now, and see if it makes a difference. I would try the ram first, I'm not too confident on IA32 boxes handling more than 4gb correctly (damn it, I'd like to have a box with 1gb ...) --=20 Goetz Bock IT Consultant Dipl.-Inf. Univ. --6TC23+W66xmFESAX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7O609f5srOMkjkQoRAi5dAKCO8Ci05insvWfxBJ+WT9yb280LdACfVrkT WovZ5vBYjIm/A6pYK5HFK2c= =7CBE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TC23+W66xmFESAX--