From: Dave Alden <alden@math.ohio-state.edu>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Upgrade to 0.9.1b8 went ok but....
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 08:16:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010726081633.A11299@math.ohio-state.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85063BBE668FD411944400D0B744267A643517@AUSMAIL>; from austin@coremetrics.com on Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 04:57:06PM -0500
Hi,
Are you aware that the XFS folks modified LVM to work with XFS (something
about a new ioctl or such)? They state that if you install the latest
patches, you'll back out the XFS-specific changes which can cause you to
lose your XFS filesystem. For more info, see the thread with a subject
of "When LVM-0.9.1beta7 will be merged to XFS cvs tree?" from:
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/mail_archive/0107/threads.html#00127
My understanding is that this applies to any LVM patches (including the beta8
patches).
...dave alden
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 04:57:06PM -0500, Gonyou, Austin wrote:
> The Devices won't mount for some reason. Here is the ouput I get from trying
> to mount an XFS LVM Volume:
>
> -----snip-----
> [root@BurnBox /root]# mount -t xfs /dev/web/webvol1 /web/
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/web/webvol1,
> or too many mounted file systems
> [root@BurnBox /root]# xfs_check /dev/web/webvol1
> xfs_check: unexpected XFS SB magic number 0x484d0200
> bad superblock magic number 484d0200, giving up
> [root@BurnBox /root]#
> -----snip-----
>
> If I run xfs_repair, it can't find the superblock either.
>
> --
> Austin Gonyou
> Systems Architect, CCNA
> Coremetrics, Inc.
> Phone: 512-796-9023
> email: austin@coremetrics.com
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-26 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-25 21:57 [linux-lvm] Upgrade to 0.9.1b8 went ok but Gonyou, Austin
2001-07-26 9:46 ` Joe Thornber
2001-07-26 12:16 ` Dave Alden [this message]
2001-07-26 12:43 ` Joe Thornber
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-26 19:28 Gonyou, Austin
2001-07-27 18:33 Dale Stephenson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010726081633.A11299@math.ohio-state.edu \
--to=alden@math.ohio-state.edu \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox