From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 14:29:13 +0200 From: Goetz Bock Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Why aren't the linux-sources up to date? Message-ID: <20010831142913.A21933@dragon.blacknet.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from Daniel_Schroeter@gillette.com on Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 10:31:07AM +0200 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: To: linux-lvm@sistina.com --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 31 '01 at 10:31, Daniel_Schroeter@gillette.com wrote: > Why don't have the sources from the linux-kernel the current LVM version? The sistina folks are still in the process of submitting the patches to Linus. While they have already been able to get close to 0.9.1beta8 (IIRC) they were not able to get the kernel's version of LVM up to 1.0.1(rc2). But I'm positive that they will get there. =20 --=20 Goetz Bock IT Consultant Dipl.-Inf. Univ. --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7j4MYf5srOMkjkQoRAt1AAJkB3+SaZhBzdKBFh2h1HHJoMIJPQwCfbtEw 0UnBMVJ5WPF2pypn3KdyCAo= =bndC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL--