From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LV size maximum
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 12:09:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010905120941.B19406@lug-owl.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B95F629.1050909@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de>; from galia@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de on Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 11:53:45AM +0200
On Wed, 2001-09-05 11:53:45 +0200, svetljo <galia@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de>
wrote in message <3B95F629.1050909@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de>:
> Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > The FAQ tells me (in Q9) something of 2TB, but lvextend INFOs
> > me of a maximum of 1TB. Where's the real limit? My understanding
> > is that limitation is coming from kernel to handle all data
> > in chunks of 512Bytes. Is the maximum number of 512Byte blocks
> > per device to be increased in some time?
> this is a part of the german lvm HOW-TO
>
> Q: Why can i not have a Logical volume biger than 256Gb ?
>
> A: This is NO absolute limit but it depends on the physical extent
> size you configured at volume group creation time. Please use option -s
> of the vgcreate command to give a larger physical extent size. For
> example with a physical extent size of 524288 KB (512 MB) you are able
> to map a logical volume of 32 Terabyte. Remember that current Linux
> kernels are limited to 1 Terabyte.
That doesn't exactly help me. I already know that text. My
problem is that there are mentioned different maximum values
for the size:
FAQ: 2TB on 32bit machines and 512 bytes block size
(Where do you read of 1TB???)
My final question is/was: Is the limit (on kernel's side) to
be raised in some *near* future?
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw . jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-05 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-05 9:33 [linux-lvm] LV size maximum Jan-Benedict Glaw
2001-09-05 9:53 ` svetljo
2001-09-05 10:09 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw [this message]
2001-09-05 10:38 ` svetljo
2001-09-05 10:24 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-09-05 18:11 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-09-05 18:32 ` [linux-lvm] lvcreate segfaults John Marquart
2001-09-05 18:57 ` John Marquart
2001-09-05 20:37 ` AJ Lewis
2001-09-05 22:42 ` John Marquart
2001-09-06 8:00 ` Joe Thornber
2001-09-06 12:32 ` AJ Lewis
2001-09-07 16:05 ` John Marquart
2001-09-10 16:08 ` AJ Lewis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010905120941.B19406@lug-owl.de \
--to=jbglaw@lug-owl.de \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox