From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] PBs with LVM over software RAID ( and XFS ? ext2 reiserfs?)
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 16:46:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010905164626.M32553@turbolinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B96757E.9010201@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de>
On Sep 05, 2001 20:57 +0200, svetljo wrote:
> i maked the VG and the LV's under 2.4.9-xfs lvm-1.0.1rc1
> but i had the XFS- mount problem with it and JFS had no problems
> and i upgraded to 2.4.10-pre2-xfs lvm-1.0.1rc2 and had no problems with
> JFS and XFS
When you say you have no problems, does that mean "mkfs.{jfs,xfs} completed
without errors" or does that mean "I have been using {JFS,XFS} under load
or running dbench/bonnie++ on it without errors". Since you say that
memtest86 does not show errors on your system, you could also try dbench,
bonnie++, or even cerberus (from VA Linux) to stress test these filesystems.
I'm pretty sure they will also show problems under stress, and this will
convince you it is a kernel or hardware problem.
> i tried with 2.4.9-ac5 lvm-1.0 and vanila 2.4.9 lvm-1.0.1rc1
> with all these kernels it seemd that the LVM is working but i couldn't
> format the LV with reiserfs and ext2
> mke2fs and mkreiserfs simply segfaults without errors
The fact that mkfs.* is causing a kernel OOPS is a sure sign of problems
in the kernel, because these are just user-space applications, and do
not run in the kernel at all. I don't think it could possibly be a
problem with these tools.
> >If you have never had this working properly, try some early kernel like
> >2.4.5 and see if it works. If not then I suspect you have a RAM problem,
> >and you may want to swap/remove SIMM/DIMMs to see if you can isolate it.
> >
> i can not understand why do you think that i could have RAM problems
> if i had RAM problems why would XFS and JFS working without problem and
> mke2fs and mkreiserfs segfaulting
There have been problems with mke2fs in the past (and maybe mkreiserfs too)
where they make a LOT of blocks dirty which exposes problems in the block
I/O layer inside the kernel. This does not mean that these tools are bad,
it means the kernel is bad, or your system is bad, and these are tools
that show this problem best.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
\ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ -- Dogbert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-05 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-05 7:57 what i need is a little attention-RE [linux-lvm] SoftRaid and LVM Jean-Eric Cuendet Jean-Eric Cuendet
2001-09-05 8:26 ` svetljo
2001-09-05 8:33 ` svetljo
2001-09-05 18:05 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-09-05 18:18 ` [linux-lvm] PBs with LVM over software RAID ( and XFS ? ext2 reiserfs?) svetljo
2001-09-05 18:32 ` svetljo
2001-09-05 18:32 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-09-05 18:57 ` svetljo
2001-09-05 22:46 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2001-09-05 23:05 ` svetljo
2001-09-06 17:27 ` [linux-lvm] PBs with LVM over software RAID ( and XFS ? ext2 reiserfs?)-2.4.7 svetljo
2001-09-07 14:50 ` Jonathan DeHaan
2001-09-06 6:44 ` [linux-lvm] PBs with LVM over software RAID ( and XFS ? ext2 reiserfs?) Luca Berra
[not found] <3B8E3F0E.8050609@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de>
[not found] ` <20010830083546.A20989@sistina.com>
2001-08-30 23:03 ` [linux-lvm] Re: HELP changing md-device's partition-type to LVM svetljo
2001-08-31 13:08 ` [linux-lvm] PBs with LVM over software RAID svetljo
2001-08-31 17:05 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-09-01 11:42 ` [linux-lvm] PBs with LVM over software RAID ( and XFS ? ext2 reiserfs?) svetljo
2001-09-01 14:11 ` svetljo
2001-09-01 22:26 ` svetljo
2001-09-02 0:44 ` svetljo
2001-09-04 3:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-09-04 9:20 ` svetljo
2001-09-01 14:20 ` svetljo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010905164626.M32553@turbolinux.com \
--to=adilger@turbolabs.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox