From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 08:46:36 -0400 From: Rob Latham Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Will LVM stay GPL? Message-ID: <20010906084636.C15933@otto.plogic.internal> References: <200109061207.f86C79N7021746@pcrz175.HRZ.Uni-Marburg.DE> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200109061207.f86C79N7021746@pcrz175.HRZ.Uni-Marburg.DE>; from gebhardt@HRZ.Uni-Marburg.DE on Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 02:07:08PM +0200 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 02:07:08PM +0200, Thomas Gebhardt wrote: > Hi, > > after the GFS switch to the non-free SPL: can we hope/trust that > LVM will remain GPL'd ? Thomas: I don't think you've been paying very close attention :> I already asked this question a week ago, and started far too much discussion: end result, it'd be very hard to change LVM's license. ==rob -- [ Rob Latham Developer, Admin, Alchemist ] [ Paralogic Inc. - www.plogic.com ] [ ] [ EAE8 DE90 85BB 526F 3181 1FCF 51C4 B6CB 08CC 0897 ]