From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:23:20 +0200 From: Goetz Bock Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Problems with 2.4.10 > lvm 1.0 Message-ID: <20010928172320.A4111@dragon.blacknet.de> References: <909EA7234316394F80BBB70A85A1EB389609BD@hermes.dimac.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <909EA7234316394F80BBB70A85A1EB389609BD@hermes.dimac.net>; from conny@dimac.net on Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 04:46:15PM +0200 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: To: "'linux-lvm@sistina.com'" --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 28 '01 at 16:46, Conny Brunnkvist / dimac.net wrote: > Making and installing them worked fine. So did the kernel-patch and its > compilation, but i get the following when trying to install or newly > compiled 1.0 module: Are you sure you patched the same kernel you're running? > depmod: get_hardblocksize >=20 > I've read somewhere else in the list-archive that changing the > get_hardblocksize lines to get_hardsect_size could help, but I have There is a 1.0.1rc2 that has fixed this bug, but has a new one with the min/max macros. For 2.4.10 you have to change the min/max macros to min_t/max_t. --=20 Goetz Bock IT Consultant Dipl.-Inf. Univ. --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7tJXnf5srOMkjkQoRAmB8AJ9Zq4otl7xHACRiSLpx8sfBv9hoCACg1Ri3 EE5iicX/sSF5ttiTvY5h0hc= =2KP/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l--