From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Dilger Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 15:17:51 -0600 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Re: linux2.4.10/lvm1.0.1rc3 does not compile Message-ID: <20011002151751.O8954@turbolinux.com> References: <20011002200722.18323.qmail@web14404.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011002200722.18323.qmail@web14404.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Oct 02, 2001 13:07 -0700, Aman Shahi wrote: > If I am not mistaken. the function > static void __upadte_hardsectsize(lv_t *lv) > has been declared and called as it is in lvm.c. But in > the definition it has been written as > static void __update_hardblocksize(lv_t *lv) > > so changing __update_hardblocksize(lv_t *lv) > in ~/LVM/1.0.1-rc3/kernel/lvm.c and > ~linux-2.4.10/drivers/md/lvm.c > to __update_hardsectsize(lv_t *lv) > should resolve this compilation problem. Yes, this is my fault. I was moving over some minor changes from my other LVM tree and trying to generate a patch for Linus, but I must have made a mistake in search & replace of variable names hitting this function name as well. Ah, the joys of having so many LVM source trees to work with. I've fixed the CVS, if someone wants to make a new -rc4 release quickly. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto, \ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?" http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ -- Dogbert