From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 18:30:37 +0100 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm 1.0 and kernel 2.2.19.Is rawio patch necessary ?? Message-ID: <20011004183037.A3711@btconnect.com> References: <3BBC550E.442F190C@ti.com> <3BBC7C22.1119BF0@promofinarsa.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BBC7C22.1119BF0@promofinarsa.es>; from jesus_navarro@promofinarsa.es on Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 05:11:30PM +0200 From: Joe Thornber Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 05:11:30PM +0200, Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ wrote: > Hi, Christian: > > christian e wrote: > > > > Hi,all > > > > I downloaded lvm 1.0 and kernel 2.2.19.Couldn't find a rawio for 2.2.19 > > so I thought it wasn't necessary.Is it ? The rawio patch for 2.2.19 is > > not here: > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/raw-io/ > > or in the PATHCES dir.. > > > > Well, I'm in same position than you, but having problems. > I also asked about the necesity of raw-io patches (specifically for > 2.2.19) but till the moment no answer. > > > I did a ./configure and then a make in the patches dir.Applied that > > patch without problems.After compiling the kernel and booting up again I > > Well, I patched kernel with raw-io for 2.2.18, and then with the lvm > patch provided by ./configure then make at PATCHES, but my kernel didn't > compile (well, the kernel did, but the make modules failed). The rawio patch is needed for snapshots. - Joe