linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [linux-lvm] LVM 0.9/1.0.x migration
@ 2001-10-19  5:25 Hadmut Danisch
  2001-10-19  7:33 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
  2001-10-19  7:40 ` Joe Thornber
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hadmut Danisch @ 2001-10-19  5:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux-LVM

Hi,

I just have a question:

I saw that README.1st and pvversion have vanished between
1.0 and 1.0.1-rcX. 

Does this mean that there is no way or no need to upgrade
anymore? Any disadvantages with continuing to use the old 
version?


regards
Hadmut Danisch

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM 0.9/1.0.x migration
  2001-10-19  5:25 [linux-lvm] LVM 0.9/1.0.x migration Hadmut Danisch
@ 2001-10-19  7:33 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
  2001-10-19  7:40 ` Joe Thornber
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Heinz J . Mauelshagen @ 2001-10-19  7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-lvm

On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 12:26:25PM +0200, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just have a question:
> 
> I saw that README.1st and pvversion have vanished between
> 1.0 and 1.0.1-rcX. 
> 
> Does this mean that there is no way or no need to upgrade
> anymore?

No need anymore.

> Any disadvantages with continuing to use the old 
> version?

Well, it depends what you mean with 'old'.

The newer versions have some more features but they fix a couple of bugs.
Check the CHANGELOG file in order to decide for yourself.

> 
> 
> regards
> Hadmut Danisch
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html

-- 

Regards,
Heinz    -- The LVM Guy --

*** Software bugs are stupid.
    Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Heinz Mauelshagen                                 Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer                       Am Sonnenhang 11
                                                  56242 Marienrachdorf
                                                  Germany
Mauelshagen@Sistina.com                           +49 2626 141200
                                                       FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM 0.9/1.0.x migration
  2001-10-19  5:25 [linux-lvm] LVM 0.9/1.0.x migration Hadmut Danisch
  2001-10-19  7:33 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
@ 2001-10-19  7:40 ` Joe Thornber
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joe Thornber @ 2001-10-19  7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-lvm

On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 12:26:25PM +0200, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just have a question:
> 
> I saw that README.1st and pvversion have vanished between
> 1.0 and 1.0.1-rcX. 
> 
> Does this mean that there is no way or no need to upgrade
> anymore? Any disadvantages with continuing to use the old 
> version?

You no longer need to upgrade to version 2 data structures.  Newer
releases understand both formats so there's no reason not to upgrade.
Newer releases will down grade any version 2 VG's it finds when you
next *change* the metadata (eg. resize an LV).

Version 2 was bogus and resulted from my not realising that
pv->pe_on_disk.size included all the blank space upto the first PE.
Making pv->pe_start redundant.

- Joe

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-10-19  7:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-10-19  5:25 [linux-lvm] LVM 0.9/1.0.x migration Hadmut Danisch
2001-10-19  7:33 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-10-19  7:40 ` Joe Thornber

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).