From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eric M. Hopper" Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Segment Failure ,while doing lvcreate Message-ID: <20011026075100.A8741@omnifarious.org> References: <20011025114525.88548.qmail@web16301.mail.tpe.yahoo.com> <3BD80807.4725174F@carolina.rr.com> <20011025074500.A4615@omnifarious.org> <20011025151459.A2828@balu.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011025151459.A2828@balu.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de>; from mdobel@kawo2.rwth-aachen.de on Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 03:14:59PM +0200 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri Oct 26 07:50:02 2001 List-Id: To: linux-lvm@sistina.com --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 03:14:59PM +0200, Markus Dobel wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 07:45:00AM -0500, Eric M. Hopper wrote: > > If gcc-2.96-96 doesn't have the problem, RH 7.2 should work just > > fine. >=20 > I still had the problem using gcc-2.96-99 on Redhat 7.1 (with > gcc-packages from rawhide). Thanks. I run RH as well, and am going to be upgrading to 7.2 on my main server box, which runs LVM. It's good to know these things. I'm actually pretty scared to upgrade since my current LVM is fairly old (0.9.1 b7). Does anybody know if this happens with gcc 3.0.1 or 3.0.2? Thanks, --=20 "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no Go= d. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." --- Thomas Jefferson "Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company." -- Mark Twain -- Eric Hopper (hopper@omnifarious.org http://www.omnifarious.org/~hopper)= -- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE72Vw0jtsvlOwvazYRAjMaAJ48NgMY9Z4PaRw+mWdGm766XOdggQCcDss/ XMJTCmTfolnYIfoqmg3a2O4= =6h86 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--